Scholarlink

Background <p>The post-pandemic expansion of virtual care in Nova Scotia aimed to improve access for patients without primary care providers. Virtual Care Nova Scotia, launched in 2021, and increased access, but equitable reach remained a concern. The Virtual Care @ Your Library (VC@YL) initiative addressed this gap by offering virtual healthcare access through public libraries in collaboration with government and health organizations.</p> Methods <p>This descriptive observational study applied the RE-AIM framework. Reach was assessed by the number of participants. Effectiveness was evaluated through service utilization and satisfaction. Adoption examined staff burden and role integration. Implementation fidelity and access barriers were documented. Maintenance was assessed via cost analysis and potential savings from avoiding emergency department (ED) and walk-in clinic visits under different utilization and cost scenarios.</p> Results <p>VC@YL engaged 518 unique users across 1,073 visits. Most users were aged 65+ (64.2%), citing technological barriers (75.4%) and support needs (77.6%) as primary reasons for use. All users successfully completed virtual care appointments, with 98% reporting positive experiences. Among library staff, 83% felt well-supported, and 65% of patron interactions required less than 15 min. Digital literacy assistance was the most common service (75.4%).</p> <p>The total project cost for VC@YL was $93,061, incorporating both one-time implementation and recurring staff costs. The cost per VC@YL utilization was $87. Avoided ED visits resulted in net savings of up to $63,614, though higher virtual care costs reduced savings in certain scenarios. Walk-in clinic diversions yielded negative cost savings due to the cost structure. Total savings ranged from $15,708 to $61,541, with per-person savings from $30 to $57, depending on virtual care consultation costs and utilization levels.</p> Conclusions <p>The VC@YL initiative demonstrated how community-based programs can effectively enhance access to virtual care, particularly for individuals facing technological barriers. This pilot project showed strong potential for improving healthcare access through practical support and leveraging existing community infrastructure. Its scalability and cost-effectiveness make it a promising model for broader implementation in similar settings.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Enhancing accessibility and equity in utilization of virtual care: Virtual Care @ Your Library pilot project

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月10日

查看全文
  • Gail Tomblin Murphy,
  • Tara Sampalli,
  • Krista Anderson,
  • Eric Stackhouse,
  • Melanie Pauls,
  • Michelle Ferris,
  • Caroline King,
  • Prosper Koto,
  • Emily Devereaux,
  • Hamzah Abbood,
  • Marta MacInnis,
  • Julia Guk

摘要

Background

The post-pandemic expansion of virtual care in Nova Scotia aimed to improve access for patients without primary care providers. Virtual Care Nova Scotia, launched in 2021, and increased access, but equitable reach remained a concern. The Virtual Care @ Your Library (VC@YL) initiative addressed this gap by offering virtual healthcare access through public libraries in collaboration with government and health organizations.

Methods

This descriptive observational study applied the RE-AIM framework. Reach was assessed by the number of participants. Effectiveness was evaluated through service utilization and satisfaction. Adoption examined staff burden and role integration. Implementation fidelity and access barriers were documented. Maintenance was assessed via cost analysis and potential savings from avoiding emergency department (ED) and walk-in clinic visits under different utilization and cost scenarios.

Results

VC@YL engaged 518 unique users across 1,073 visits. Most users were aged 65+ (64.2%), citing technological barriers (75.4%) and support needs (77.6%) as primary reasons for use. All users successfully completed virtual care appointments, with 98% reporting positive experiences. Among library staff, 83% felt well-supported, and 65% of patron interactions required less than 15 min. Digital literacy assistance was the most common service (75.4%).

The total project cost for VC@YL was $93,061, incorporating both one-time implementation and recurring staff costs. The cost per VC@YL utilization was $87. Avoided ED visits resulted in net savings of up to $63,614, though higher virtual care costs reduced savings in certain scenarios. Walk-in clinic diversions yielded negative cost savings due to the cost structure. Total savings ranged from $15,708 to $61,541, with per-person savings from $30 to $57, depending on virtual care consultation costs and utilization levels.

Conclusions

The VC@YL initiative demonstrated how community-based programs can effectively enhance access to virtual care, particularly for individuals facing technological barriers. This pilot project showed strong potential for improving healthcare access through practical support and leveraging existing community infrastructure. Its scalability and cost-effectiveness make it a promising model for broader implementation in similar settings.