Objective <p>This study systematically integrated qualitative research regarding nursing students’ experiences using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI). It aimed to provide an evidence-based basis to facilitate the safe, appropriate, and effective use of GAI among nursing students.</p> Design <p>A qualitative systematic review.</p> Data sources <p>PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed were searched for qualitative studies addressing nursing students’ experiences with GAI, covering the period from January 1, 2015, to January 29, 2026.</p> Methods <p>The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using qualitative research quality appraisal criteria developed by the JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care (Australia). A meta-synthesis approach was used to synthesize findings, and the ConQual tool was applied to assess confidence in the results.</p> Results <p>Twenty-four studies were included, producing 41 findings grouped into 11 sub-themes and subsequently synthesized into four themes: perceived benefits, perceived shortcomings, perceived risks, and perceived needs.</p> Conclusions <p>Nursing students’ experiences with GAI were found to be complex and sometimes contradictory. Therefore, educational institutions, educators, and technology developers should enhance relevant technical, educational, and policy support frameworks to ensure the appropriate, safe, and effective use of GAI tools among nursing students.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The experience of nursing students using generative artificial intelligence: a qualitative meta-synthesis

  • Sihua Wang,
  • Shuzhen Niu,
  • Xinyu Zhang,
  • Qianqian Cao,
  • Qihong Li,
  • Jia Yu,
  • Jinxia Jiang,
  • Li Zeng

摘要

Objective

This study systematically integrated qualitative research regarding nursing students’ experiences using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI). It aimed to provide an evidence-based basis to facilitate the safe, appropriate, and effective use of GAI among nursing students.

Design

A qualitative systematic review.

Data sources

PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed were searched for qualitative studies addressing nursing students’ experiences with GAI, covering the period from January 1, 2015, to January 29, 2026.

Methods

The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using qualitative research quality appraisal criteria developed by the JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care (Australia). A meta-synthesis approach was used to synthesize findings, and the ConQual tool was applied to assess confidence in the results.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included, producing 41 findings grouped into 11 sub-themes and subsequently synthesized into four themes: perceived benefits, perceived shortcomings, perceived risks, and perceived needs.

Conclusions

Nursing students’ experiences with GAI were found to be complex and sometimes contradictory. Therefore, educational institutions, educators, and technology developers should enhance relevant technical, educational, and policy support frameworks to ensure the appropriate, safe, and effective use of GAI tools among nursing students.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.