Scholarlink

Background <p>Worldwide, nurses have been at the frontline of the Covid-19 pandemic response and central to its effectiveness. They faced numerous ethical dilemmas which in turn resulted in considerable moral distress. However, there are knowledge gaps on the experiences of critical care nurses in South Africa during the pandemic.</p> Aim <p>Explore the experiences, specifically the ethical dilemmas and moral distress, of critical care nurses working in South African hospitals.</p> Methods <p>Gilligan’s ethic of care theory informed this exploratory, qualitative descriptive study with nurses who had experience of taking care of individuals with Covid-19 and working in intensive (critical) care units in the Gauteng province of South Africa. We recruited eligible nurses through a combination of social media adverts, snowballing, and referral from professional associations or trade unions. Following voluntary informed consent, we conducted in-depth interviews with nurses using an interview guide that focused on personal and professional experiences during the pandemic, ethical dilemmas, relationships with other colleagues and/or management, and the availability of support systems. Data was analysed thematically.</p> Results <p>The participants comprised 21 nurses, 16 females and 5 males with a mean age of 38 years. The majority were professional nurses (20/21 = 95%) and from the public health sector (17/21 = 81%). Nurses highlighted the tension between their deep caring for patients and the realities of taking care of patients during the Covid-19 pandemic that necessitated pragmatic compromises, such as doing the bare minimum. They expressed ambivalence about the Nursing Oath because they were acutely aware of the moral obligation to put the health of their patients as their first consideration, yet they faced the personal risk of infections and disease exposure. The uncertainty and fear of the pandemic, of infection, of the unknown, and of being in the frontline of health care provision resulted in considerable moral distress. Simultaneously, the perceived lack of appreciation for their work and for risking their lives as health care providers, and the resource constraints intersected with and exacerbated both ethical dilemmas and moral distress.</p> Conclusions <p>This study highlights the ethical dilemmas that nurses experienced during the pandemic, and their perceived moral distress. It contributes to the discourse on healthcare ethics, particularly in crisis situations, and highlights the need for robust support systems for nurses.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

‘Unable to dodge the bullet’: a qualitative study of ethical dilemmas and moral distress of critical care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic in a South African Province

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • Busisiwe Sibiya,
  • Laetitia C. Rispel

摘要

Background

Worldwide, nurses have been at the frontline of the Covid-19 pandemic response and central to its effectiveness. They faced numerous ethical dilemmas which in turn resulted in considerable moral distress. However, there are knowledge gaps on the experiences of critical care nurses in South Africa during the pandemic.

Aim

Explore the experiences, specifically the ethical dilemmas and moral distress, of critical care nurses working in South African hospitals.

Methods

Gilligan’s ethic of care theory informed this exploratory, qualitative descriptive study with nurses who had experience of taking care of individuals with Covid-19 and working in intensive (critical) care units in the Gauteng province of South Africa. We recruited eligible nurses through a combination of social media adverts, snowballing, and referral from professional associations or trade unions. Following voluntary informed consent, we conducted in-depth interviews with nurses using an interview guide that focused on personal and professional experiences during the pandemic, ethical dilemmas, relationships with other colleagues and/or management, and the availability of support systems. Data was analysed thematically.

Results

The participants comprised 21 nurses, 16 females and 5 males with a mean age of 38 years. The majority were professional nurses (20/21 = 95%) and from the public health sector (17/21 = 81%). Nurses highlighted the tension between their deep caring for patients and the realities of taking care of patients during the Covid-19 pandemic that necessitated pragmatic compromises, such as doing the bare minimum. They expressed ambivalence about the Nursing Oath because they were acutely aware of the moral obligation to put the health of their patients as their first consideration, yet they faced the personal risk of infections and disease exposure. The uncertainty and fear of the pandemic, of infection, of the unknown, and of being in the frontline of health care provision resulted in considerable moral distress. Simultaneously, the perceived lack of appreciation for their work and for risking their lives as health care providers, and the resource constraints intersected with and exacerbated both ethical dilemmas and moral distress.

Conclusions

This study highlights the ethical dilemmas that nurses experienced during the pandemic, and their perceived moral distress. It contributes to the discourse on healthcare ethics, particularly in crisis situations, and highlights the need for robust support systems for nurses.