Scholarlink

Objective <p>Clustering is widely used to identify meaningful subgroups in biomedical data, but interpretation remains challenging, especially in the absence of ground-truth labels. Moreover, clustering often produces multiple plausible solutions without a single correct answer. Using dementia phenotypes as a case study, we introduce a <i>Formal Explanation Space</i> (FES) to improve interpretability and facilitate comparison across competing cluster solutions.</p> Methods <p>We used spectral coclustering and spectral biclustering to cluster a dataset of dementia patients based on clinical phenotypes (signs and symptoms). To enhance interpretability, we constructed an FES to explain algorithm behavior, assess cluster quality, identify influential features, and characterize cluster composition. Although simultaneous clustering is unsupervised, interpretation was aided by diagnostic labels, which we used for external validation of cluster composition.</p> Results <p>Spectral coclustering and spectral biclustering each identified five biologically plausible dementia subgroups, though subgroup composition differed by method. The FES provided a structured framework for comparing these divergent outputs.</p> Conclusions <p>Clustering complex biomedical data often produces multiple biologically plausible solutions. Retaining and comparing such solutions within a formal explanation space enhances interpretability and supports the discovery of complementary insights across methods.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A formal explanation space for the simultaneous clustering of neurologic diseases based on their signs and symptoms

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月8日

查看全文
  • Raghu Yelugam,
  • Daniel B. Hier,
  • Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi,
  • Michael D. Carrithers,
  • Donald C. Wunsch II

摘要

Objective

Clustering is widely used to identify meaningful subgroups in biomedical data, but interpretation remains challenging, especially in the absence of ground-truth labels. Moreover, clustering often produces multiple plausible solutions without a single correct answer. Using dementia phenotypes as a case study, we introduce a Formal Explanation Space (FES) to improve interpretability and facilitate comparison across competing cluster solutions.

Methods

We used spectral coclustering and spectral biclustering to cluster a dataset of dementia patients based on clinical phenotypes (signs and symptoms). To enhance interpretability, we constructed an FES to explain algorithm behavior, assess cluster quality, identify influential features, and characterize cluster composition. Although simultaneous clustering is unsupervised, interpretation was aided by diagnostic labels, which we used for external validation of cluster composition.

Results

Spectral coclustering and spectral biclustering each identified five biologically plausible dementia subgroups, though subgroup composition differed by method. The FES provided a structured framework for comparing these divergent outputs.

Conclusions

Clustering complex biomedical data often produces multiple biologically plausible solutions. Retaining and comparing such solutions within a formal explanation space enhances interpretability and supports the discovery of complementary insights across methods.