Scholarlink

Background <p>With increasing recognition of children’s evolving decision-making capacities, assessing decision-making capacity in pediatric clinical practice has become legally and ethically important, yet no standardized assessment approach exists. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate assessment tools for decision-making capacity in children and to examine their clinical applicability and validation in pediatric populations.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a systematic search in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across major academic databases and grey‑literature sources. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using predefined criteria. We appraised validation studies using the QUADAS‑2 tool. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcomes, a descriptive synthesis was conducted.</p> Results <p>A total of 27 peer‑reviewed studies and one guideline met the inclusion criteria. Across these studies, we identified seven tools: the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools (MacCAT-T and MacCAT-CR), the Measure of Competency to Render Informed Treatment Decisions (MOC), the Maturtest, the University of California San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC), the Competency Questionnaire for Pediatric Population (CQ-Peds), and the Hopkins Competency Assessment Test (HCAT). The assessment tools demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in purpose, conceptual grounding, methodological approach, administration, time requirements, scoring procedures, and validation in child populations. The Maturtest, assessing moral maturity, and the child-adapted MacCAT-CR, assessing decision-making capacity in clinical research, are the only two identified validated assessment tools in a child population. One official WHO guideline was also identified.</p> Conclusions <p>We identified seven assessment tools, assessing either moral maturity or decision-making capacity. The child-adapted MacCAT-CR remains the only validated instrument for assessing decision-making capacity in children, although mainly in research settings. No validated tool for routine clinical practice was identified, highlighting the need for clinically applicable, multidimensional assessment tools.</p> Trial registration <p>PROSPERO: CRD420251052918.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of tools to assess decision-making capacity in minor adolescents in clinical settings: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月26日

查看全文
  • Charelity Adu-Gallant,
  • Fenya Van Hauwaert,
  • J. Peter de Winter,
  • Jaan Toelen,
  • Kris Dierickx

摘要

Background

With increasing recognition of children’s evolving decision-making capacities, assessing decision-making capacity in pediatric clinical practice has become legally and ethically important, yet no standardized assessment approach exists. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate assessment tools for decision-making capacity in children and to examine their clinical applicability and validation in pediatric populations.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across major academic databases and grey‑literature sources. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using predefined criteria. We appraised validation studies using the QUADAS‑2 tool. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcomes, a descriptive synthesis was conducted.

Results

A total of 27 peer‑reviewed studies and one guideline met the inclusion criteria. Across these studies, we identified seven tools: the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools (MacCAT-T and MacCAT-CR), the Measure of Competency to Render Informed Treatment Decisions (MOC), the Maturtest, the University of California San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC), the Competency Questionnaire for Pediatric Population (CQ-Peds), and the Hopkins Competency Assessment Test (HCAT). The assessment tools demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in purpose, conceptual grounding, methodological approach, administration, time requirements, scoring procedures, and validation in child populations. The Maturtest, assessing moral maturity, and the child-adapted MacCAT-CR, assessing decision-making capacity in clinical research, are the only two identified validated assessment tools in a child population. One official WHO guideline was also identified.

Conclusions

We identified seven assessment tools, assessing either moral maturity or decision-making capacity. The child-adapted MacCAT-CR remains the only validated instrument for assessing decision-making capacity in children, although mainly in research settings. No validated tool for routine clinical practice was identified, highlighting the need for clinically applicable, multidimensional assessment tools.

Trial registration

PROSPERO: CRD420251052918.