Background <p>To evaluate whether performance-based sequencing of clinical placements improves learning outcomes compared with randomized sequencing in undergraduate physiotherapy education.</p> Methods <p>Undergraduate physiotherapy students from six universities in China were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group’s placement order (inpatient or outpatient) was determined based on theoretical and clinical performance, while the control group’s order was randomized. Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX), theoretical performance evaluation and the Clinical Reasoning and Reflection Self-Rating Scale (SACRR) were evaluated before and after placement using t-test.</p> Results <p>112 students participated in the study. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical and theoretical performance post-placement. The experimental group had greater improvements in Mini-CEX scores (41.02 ± 12.37 vs. 38.35 ± 9.65, <i>p</i> = 0.031), with significant gains in history taking (<i>p</i> = 0.005), professionalism (<i>p</i> = 0.006), and counseling (<i>p</i> = 0.007). Theoretical test scores improved more in the experimental group (from 51.83 ± 9.89 to 69.00 ± 8.93 vs. 54.56 ± 7.62 to 66.52 ± 10.71, <i>p</i> = 0.038). The SACRR scores also showed greater improvements in the experimental group (92.13 ± 11.72 to 109.48 ± 10.63 vs. 91.30 ± 10.02 to 97.93 ± 10.63, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with significant gains across all subdomains.</p> Conclusions <p>Sequencing clinical placements according to student performance yielded greater improvements in history taking, professional attitude, and communication skills, as well as theoretical knowledge and clinical reasoning, compared with randomized sequencing. These findings suggest that performance-based placement scheduling can strengthen key patient interaction and reasoning competencies in physiotherapy students.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Academic performance-based sequencing of inpatient and outpatient placements enhances learning in physiotherapy undergraduates: a controlled study

  • Yiyi Zheng,
  • Yongxue Li,
  • Kun Zheng,
  • Meizhen Liang,
  • Xi Chen,
  • Wai Leung Ambrose Lo

摘要

Background

To evaluate whether performance-based sequencing of clinical placements improves learning outcomes compared with randomized sequencing in undergraduate physiotherapy education.

Methods

Undergraduate physiotherapy students from six universities in China were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group’s placement order (inpatient or outpatient) was determined based on theoretical and clinical performance, while the control group’s order was randomized. Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX), theoretical performance evaluation and the Clinical Reasoning and Reflection Self-Rating Scale (SACRR) were evaluated before and after placement using t-test.

Results

112 students participated in the study. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical and theoretical performance post-placement. The experimental group had greater improvements in Mini-CEX scores (41.02 ± 12.37 vs. 38.35 ± 9.65, p = 0.031), with significant gains in history taking (p = 0.005), professionalism (p = 0.006), and counseling (p = 0.007). Theoretical test scores improved more in the experimental group (from 51.83 ± 9.89 to 69.00 ± 8.93 vs. 54.56 ± 7.62 to 66.52 ± 10.71, p = 0.038). The SACRR scores also showed greater improvements in the experimental group (92.13 ± 11.72 to 109.48 ± 10.63 vs. 91.30 ± 10.02 to 97.93 ± 10.63, p < 0.001), with significant gains across all subdomains.

Conclusions

Sequencing clinical placements according to student performance yielded greater improvements in history taking, professional attitude, and communication skills, as well as theoretical knowledge and clinical reasoning, compared with randomized sequencing. These findings suggest that performance-based placement scheduling can strengthen key patient interaction and reasoning competencies in physiotherapy students.