Scholarlink

Background <p>Dentistry must reduce its ecological footprint in response to the triple ecological disaster of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. It is thus necessary to introduce or reinforce sustainability in dental curricula and continuing education programmes. As such, this study aimed to explore how dental professionals perceive ecological issues, conceptualize and integrate sustainable practices into clinical routines, and identify their needs regarding continuing education in this domain.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a qualitative, exploratory study in partnership with the Ministry of Health and professional dental organizations of the province of Québec, Canada. We held six virtual focus groups (60–90&#xa0;min) with a sample of 28 Québec practitioners—8 dentists, 9 dental hygienists, and 11 dental assistants—from public and private clinics. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s approach.</p> Results <p>Most participants expressed concern about climate change and a sense of responsibility toward future generations. They defined sustainability as minimizing ecological impact without compromising infection control, but acknowledged a lack of information on the subject, often equating it with waste reduction while overlooking higher-impact sources such as patient and staff travel. Their self-initiated actions, which were shaped by their professional roles, faced barriers including time pressure, hierarchical decision-making, the cost of sustainable products, and infection control rules, operating at individual, clinic, and policy levels. All groups actively wanted continuing education on sustainable dentistry, preferably in a hybrid format, and requested clear clinical protocols along with supportive procurement and regulatory policies to make change feasible.</p> Conclusions <p>Our analysis met the objectives by describing clinicians’ perceptions and routines, identifying needs foental professionals expressed concerns aboutr continuing education, and surfacing multilevel barriers and enablers. Accordingly, it is important to develop continuing education programmes on sustainable dentistry that are tailored to their learning preferences and professionals’ roles within the clinic. Training should be complemented by the provision of clear clinical protocols, designated sustainability leads, and procurement systems that remove cost and supply barriers.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

How do dental professionals perceive sustainable dentistry? A qualitative study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月11日

查看全文
  • Newsha Toreihi,
  • Alice Baras,
  • Jean-Noël Vergnes,
  • Brett Duane,
  • Nicolas Dritsch,
  • Jean-François Lortie,
  • Wendy Somerville,
  • Tammy Thomson,
  • Zovinar Der Khatchadourian,
  • Mehrnoosh Alborzi,
  • Richard Hovey,
  • Stéphanie Morneau,
  • Christophe Bedos

摘要

Background

Dentistry must reduce its ecological footprint in response to the triple ecological disaster of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. It is thus necessary to introduce or reinforce sustainability in dental curricula and continuing education programmes. As such, this study aimed to explore how dental professionals perceive ecological issues, conceptualize and integrate sustainable practices into clinical routines, and identify their needs regarding continuing education in this domain.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative, exploratory study in partnership with the Ministry of Health and professional dental organizations of the province of Québec, Canada. We held six virtual focus groups (60–90 min) with a sample of 28 Québec practitioners—8 dentists, 9 dental hygienists, and 11 dental assistants—from public and private clinics. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s approach.

Results

Most participants expressed concern about climate change and a sense of responsibility toward future generations. They defined sustainability as minimizing ecological impact without compromising infection control, but acknowledged a lack of information on the subject, often equating it with waste reduction while overlooking higher-impact sources such as patient and staff travel. Their self-initiated actions, which were shaped by their professional roles, faced barriers including time pressure, hierarchical decision-making, the cost of sustainable products, and infection control rules, operating at individual, clinic, and policy levels. All groups actively wanted continuing education on sustainable dentistry, preferably in a hybrid format, and requested clear clinical protocols along with supportive procurement and regulatory policies to make change feasible.

Conclusions

Our analysis met the objectives by describing clinicians’ perceptions and routines, identifying needs foental professionals expressed concerns aboutr continuing education, and surfacing multilevel barriers and enablers. Accordingly, it is important to develop continuing education programmes on sustainable dentistry that are tailored to their learning preferences and professionals’ roles within the clinic. Training should be complemented by the provision of clear clinical protocols, designated sustainability leads, and procurement systems that remove cost and supply barriers.