Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Home-based palliative care (HBPC) enhances access to palliative care, reduces health-related costs, and improves health outcomes. However, studies centered on the socioeconomic profile of HBPC are limited. This study aimed to describe the socio-economic profile of HBPC recipients in Kerala, India, and to assess the impact of the disease on the financial, educational, and employment status of their family members.</p> Methods <p>The socio-economic details of HBPC beneficiaries of a non-profit palliative care organization were collected. Individuals enrolled under HBPC who first received it between March 2020 and April 2024 were included in this study. Data on the socioeconomic details of the beneficiaries were extracted and digitized from registries maintained by Pallium India. Of the 1296 entries received, 964 with complete data were included in the final analysis, which was performed using Jamovi v2.3.28.</p> Results <p>The mean (SD) age of the beneficiaries was 61.0 (16.6) years. Among the total, 52.9% of the beneficiaries were female, and the median (IQR) family size was 9 (6–13). A total of 83.25% lived in their own homes, and 62.97% resided in rural areas. Cancer (21.1%), followed by Cerebrovascular diseases (20.3%), were the two most common conditions requiring HBPC. Debt was reported by 31.3% of families, with a median (IQR) debt of 2389.5 (597.4–4779.0) USD. The primary reason for debt was health-related expenses. 62.5% of families had beneficiaries receiving pensions, and 7.21% received support from another organization. In 4.2% of families, there was no breadwinner, and 9.5% and 66.8% of patients could not afford food and medicines, respectively. A family member lost their job in 8.0% of families, while in 2.8% of families, a child had to discontinue their education due to the patient’s illness.</p> Conclusion <p>Healthcare costs were the major cause of debt, with many HBPC recipients unable to afford medicines. Moreover, the employment and education of other family members were also threatened. Further strengthening of social and economic security measures is essential to safeguard these individuals and their families.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Socioeconomic profile and vulnerabilities of people receiving home-based palliative care in Kerala, India

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月2日

查看全文
  • Jashanjot Singh Mangat,
  • Shreyas Patil,
  • Deepak Sudhakaran,
  • Smriti Rana,
  • MM Sunil Kumar,
  • Parth Sharma

摘要

Introduction

Home-based palliative care (HBPC) enhances access to palliative care, reduces health-related costs, and improves health outcomes. However, studies centered on the socioeconomic profile of HBPC are limited. This study aimed to describe the socio-economic profile of HBPC recipients in Kerala, India, and to assess the impact of the disease on the financial, educational, and employment status of their family members.

Methods

The socio-economic details of HBPC beneficiaries of a non-profit palliative care organization were collected. Individuals enrolled under HBPC who first received it between March 2020 and April 2024 were included in this study. Data on the socioeconomic details of the beneficiaries were extracted and digitized from registries maintained by Pallium India. Of the 1296 entries received, 964 with complete data were included in the final analysis, which was performed using Jamovi v2.3.28.

Results

The mean (SD) age of the beneficiaries was 61.0 (16.6) years. Among the total, 52.9% of the beneficiaries were female, and the median (IQR) family size was 9 (6–13). A total of 83.25% lived in their own homes, and 62.97% resided in rural areas. Cancer (21.1%), followed by Cerebrovascular diseases (20.3%), were the two most common conditions requiring HBPC. Debt was reported by 31.3% of families, with a median (IQR) debt of 2389.5 (597.4–4779.0) USD. The primary reason for debt was health-related expenses. 62.5% of families had beneficiaries receiving pensions, and 7.21% received support from another organization. In 4.2% of families, there was no breadwinner, and 9.5% and 66.8% of patients could not afford food and medicines, respectively. A family member lost their job in 8.0% of families, while in 2.8% of families, a child had to discontinue their education due to the patient’s illness.

Conclusion

Healthcare costs were the major cause of debt, with many HBPC recipients unable to afford medicines. Moreover, the employment and education of other family members were also threatened. Further strengthening of social and economic security measures is essential to safeguard these individuals and their families.