Scholarlink

Background <p>At present, the clinical orthodontic effects associated with the application of clear aligners to extraction cases featuring retraction of the anterior teeth remain a cause for concern. In the present study, the biomechanical effects of this strategy on the maxillary dentition, periodontal ligament, and clear aligners were analysed when palatal micro-implants were used in combination with different traction methods.</p> Methods <p>Several models, including the maxillary dentition (without first premolars), maxilla, periodontal ligaments (PDLs), and aligners, were constructed and imported to finite element software. Four model groups were created: (1) G1 (pure aligner retraction force), (2) G2 (the combination of aligner retraction force with elastic force applied between the palatal mini-implant and the traction button), (3) G3 (the combination of aligner retraction force with elastic force applied between the palatal mini-implant and the precision cutting), and (4) G4 (the combination of aligner retraction force with passive ligation, i.e., rigid wire ligation between the mini-implant and the lingual button on the second premolar). The magnitude of the elastic traction force was increased from 100&#xa0;g to 250&#xa0;g, with a gradient increment of 50&#xa0;g. Subsequently, finite element analysis was performed to simulate the biomechanical effects.</p> Results <p>Compared with G1, the incisors in G2 exhibited a larger incisor retraction distance and better vertical control. Although incisor retraction in G3 was slightly lower than that in G2, this method demonstrated better control of anterior teeth torque and anchorage of the posterior teeth. In G4, there was a tendency for a slight increase in incisor retraction compared to G1, while vertical extrusion and lingual tipping of the incisors were the most severe. In G2 and G3, the magnitude of the palatal elastic retraction force within the range of 100 to 150&#xa0;g was conducive to the retraction of incisors, torque and vertical control of anterior teeth.</p> Conclusions <p>The combination of aligner retraction force with an appropriate retraction force applied to palatal micro-implants was beneficial for improving the efficiency of incisor retraction, as well as enhancing both vertical control and torque control. However, appropriate overtreatment should be designed to ensure bodily retraction and reduce tipping movement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Biomechanical analysis of retracting maxillary incisors using clear aligners with palatal mini-implants in extraction cases: a finite-element analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月24日

查看全文
  • Zixuan Zhao,
  • Zhiwei Wang,
  • Lei Liang,
  • Lu Liu,
  • Yuan Cao,
  • Fang Jin

摘要

Background

At present, the clinical orthodontic effects associated with the application of clear aligners to extraction cases featuring retraction of the anterior teeth remain a cause for concern. In the present study, the biomechanical effects of this strategy on the maxillary dentition, periodontal ligament, and clear aligners were analysed when palatal micro-implants were used in combination with different traction methods.

Methods

Several models, including the maxillary dentition (without first premolars), maxilla, periodontal ligaments (PDLs), and aligners, were constructed and imported to finite element software. Four model groups were created: (1) G1 (pure aligner retraction force), (2) G2 (the combination of aligner retraction force with elastic force applied between the palatal mini-implant and the traction button), (3) G3 (the combination of aligner retraction force with elastic force applied between the palatal mini-implant and the precision cutting), and (4) G4 (the combination of aligner retraction force with passive ligation, i.e., rigid wire ligation between the mini-implant and the lingual button on the second premolar). The magnitude of the elastic traction force was increased from 100 g to 250 g, with a gradient increment of 50 g. Subsequently, finite element analysis was performed to simulate the biomechanical effects.

Results

Compared with G1, the incisors in G2 exhibited a larger incisor retraction distance and better vertical control. Although incisor retraction in G3 was slightly lower than that in G2, this method demonstrated better control of anterior teeth torque and anchorage of the posterior teeth. In G4, there was a tendency for a slight increase in incisor retraction compared to G1, while vertical extrusion and lingual tipping of the incisors were the most severe. In G2 and G3, the magnitude of the palatal elastic retraction force within the range of 100 to 150 g was conducive to the retraction of incisors, torque and vertical control of anterior teeth.

Conclusions

The combination of aligner retraction force with an appropriate retraction force applied to palatal micro-implants was beneficial for improving the efficiency of incisor retraction, as well as enhancing both vertical control and torque control. However, appropriate overtreatment should be designed to ensure bodily retraction and reduce tipping movement.