Scholarlink

Background <p>Differentiating between oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and osteomyelitis (OM) through imaging is essential due to the overlapping clinical and radiological presentations of these conditions, complicating diagnosis. This study assessed the adjunctive diagnostic value of mandibular canal–related radiographic features on panoramic radiographs to aid in differentiating OSCC from OM, and to propose a simple and efficient approach for general dental practitioners.</p> Methods <p>A total of 166 panoramic radiographs from patients with histopathologically confirmed OSCC (<i>n</i> = 83) and OM (<i>n</i> = 83), involving the mandibular third molar region and/or retromolar trigone with bone destruction, were retrospectively analyzed. The border changes of the mandibular canal and adjacent sclerosis were assessed on the panoramic radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared tests to determine the significance of differences between OSCC and OM for each radiographic feature. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was also performed to evaluate the discriminative performance of a composite scoring model for distinguishing OSCC from OM, in which one point was assigned for each high-risk imaging feature for OSCC.</p> Results <p>Destruction of the borders of the mandibular canal was significantly more frequent in OSCC cases (<i>P &lt;</i> 0.001), while border thickening of the mandibular canal and adjacent sclerosis were more commonly associated with OM (<i>P &lt;</i> 0.001). Additionally, a composite scoring model based on these imaging features demonstrated high discriminative performance, with an area under the curve of 0.92, further supporting differentiation between OSCC and OM.</p> Conclusion <p>The changes in the mandibular canal, including border destruction, border thickening, and adjacent sclerosis, observed on panoramic radiographs may serve as useful adjunctive indicators for differentiating OSCC from OM. Recognition of these features on routine panoramic imaging may help guide appropriate further diagnostic evaluation, particularly in clinical settings where immediate access to three-dimensional imaging is limited.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Differential diagnosis between oral squamous cell carcinoma and osteomyelitis through mandibular canal changes on panoramic radiographs

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月2日

查看全文
  • Jung Eun Park,
  • Kyung-Hoe Huh,
  • Ju-Hee Kang,
  • Jo-Eun Kim,
  • Won-Jin Yi,
  • Min-Suk Heo,
  • Sam-Sun Lee

摘要

Background

Differentiating between oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and osteomyelitis (OM) through imaging is essential due to the overlapping clinical and radiological presentations of these conditions, complicating diagnosis. This study assessed the adjunctive diagnostic value of mandibular canal–related radiographic features on panoramic radiographs to aid in differentiating OSCC from OM, and to propose a simple and efficient approach for general dental practitioners.

Methods

A total of 166 panoramic radiographs from patients with histopathologically confirmed OSCC (n = 83) and OM (n = 83), involving the mandibular third molar region and/or retromolar trigone with bone destruction, were retrospectively analyzed. The border changes of the mandibular canal and adjacent sclerosis were assessed on the panoramic radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared tests to determine the significance of differences between OSCC and OM for each radiographic feature. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was also performed to evaluate the discriminative performance of a composite scoring model for distinguishing OSCC from OM, in which one point was assigned for each high-risk imaging feature for OSCC.

Results

Destruction of the borders of the mandibular canal was significantly more frequent in OSCC cases (P < 0.001), while border thickening of the mandibular canal and adjacent sclerosis were more commonly associated with OM (P < 0.001). Additionally, a composite scoring model based on these imaging features demonstrated high discriminative performance, with an area under the curve of 0.92, further supporting differentiation between OSCC and OM.

Conclusion

The changes in the mandibular canal, including border destruction, border thickening, and adjacent sclerosis, observed on panoramic radiographs may serve as useful adjunctive indicators for differentiating OSCC from OM. Recognition of these features on routine panoramic imaging may help guide appropriate further diagnostic evaluation, particularly in clinical settings where immediate access to three-dimensional imaging is limited.