Scholarlink

Objective <p>To evaluate the accuracy of clear aligners in premolar extraction cases by measuring the differences between predicted and achieved tooth movements.</p> Materials and methods <p>The sample consisted of 32 patients undergoing extraction treatment with clear aligners, with a mean age of 21.2 (+-7.6) years. Discrepancies between achieved and predicted tooth movements were determined using paired t-tests and independent t-tests. The discrepancies per tooth group were assessed per dental arch and were evaluated for clinical significance (&gt; 2 degrees; &gt;0.5&#xa0;mm).</p> Results <p>Linear discrepancies that demonstrated clinical significance (&gt; 0.5&#xa0;mm) in the maxillary arch were the buccal-lingual and occlusal-gingival discrepancies for the central incisors (0.61&#xa0;mm and 0.87&#xa0;mm) and the buccal-lingual discrepancy of the first premolars (0.59&#xa0;mm). The first and second molars in the mandibular arch showed buccal-lingual discrepancies of 0.51&#xa0;mm and 0.65&#xa0;mm, respectively. In comparison, the central (0.66&#xa0;mm) and lateral incisors (0.57&#xa0;mm) and first and second premolars (both 0.55&#xa0;mm) showed clinically significant discrepancies in the occlusal-gingival direction. All angular discrepancies in the maxillary and mandibular dentition were statistically and clinically significant (&gt; 2 degrees).</p> Conclusions <p>Loss of torque and occlusal-gingival discrepancies of the upper and lower incisors were clinically significant. Unplanned tipping of teeth adjacent to the extraction site was also clinically significant. These factors should be considered and mitigated at the ClinCheck stage to aid efficiency.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Retrospective clinical audit of extraction cases treated with clear aligner therapy

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月4日

查看全文
  • Greeshma Jayapalan,
  • Ismaeel Hansa,
  • Raghdah Alzuhairy,
  • Sandra Tai,
  • Anand Marya,
  • Samar M. Adel,
  • Nikhillesh Vaiid

摘要

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of clear aligners in premolar extraction cases by measuring the differences between predicted and achieved tooth movements.

Materials and methods

The sample consisted of 32 patients undergoing extraction treatment with clear aligners, with a mean age of 21.2 (+-7.6) years. Discrepancies between achieved and predicted tooth movements were determined using paired t-tests and independent t-tests. The discrepancies per tooth group were assessed per dental arch and were evaluated for clinical significance (> 2 degrees; >0.5 mm).

Results

Linear discrepancies that demonstrated clinical significance (> 0.5 mm) in the maxillary arch were the buccal-lingual and occlusal-gingival discrepancies for the central incisors (0.61 mm and 0.87 mm) and the buccal-lingual discrepancy of the first premolars (0.59 mm). The first and second molars in the mandibular arch showed buccal-lingual discrepancies of 0.51 mm and 0.65 mm, respectively. In comparison, the central (0.66 mm) and lateral incisors (0.57 mm) and first and second premolars (both 0.55 mm) showed clinically significant discrepancies in the occlusal-gingival direction. All angular discrepancies in the maxillary and mandibular dentition were statistically and clinically significant (> 2 degrees).

Conclusions

Loss of torque and occlusal-gingival discrepancies of the upper and lower incisors were clinically significant. Unplanned tipping of teeth adjacent to the extraction site was also clinically significant. These factors should be considered and mitigated at the ClinCheck stage to aid efficiency.