Background <p>The use of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy in implant dentistry for enhancing the osseointegration is proven in many studies. However, the cumulative data of&#xa0;its effect around dental implants in patients is limited.</p> Objectives <p>The purpose of&#xa0;the present study was to evaluate the effect of the PBM therapy on primary and secondary implant stability.</p> Material and methods <p>The studies included in the review and meta-analysis were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the PICOS criteria. The RoB 2 tool was used for assessing the risk of&#xa0;bias and the RevMan software, v. 5.4, was used for meta-analysis. Quantitative analysis was done using two tools considering the implant stability measurement using Ostellmeter and radiographs as the outcome. The mean and standard deviation (M ± SD) values for implant stability as well as the sample size were extracted from the articles, and the inverse variance method with random effects was used for meta-analysis. The forest plots for all time intervals were inspected to estimate the heterogeneity.</p> Results <p>A&#xa0;total of&#xa0;117 articles were initially retrieved, out of&#xa0;which 62 remained after duplicate removal. 15 articles were included in the review for qualitative analysis and 8 were eligible for quantitative analysis. The meta-analysis showed that at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks, the control group showed better result than experimental group, at 3 weeks the implant stability favoured the experimental group whereas at 6 and 12 weeks there was no difference seen between control and experimental group.</p> Conclusions <p>The PBM therapy on implant stability has yielded mixed results. While some studies have demonstrated a&#xa0;positive effect, others have reported no significant impact. Consequently, further research is warranted to fully elucidate the effects of PBM therapy on implant stability.</p>