Background <p>This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and titanium substructures produced by different methods.</p> Methods <p>After designing 51 disc-shaped samples, three groups were created according to material type and manufacturing method Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) group prepared by selective laser melting (GC), titanium group prepared by milling (GTi1) and titanium group prepared by selective laser melting (GTi2). Surface roughness values (Ra, Rz) of six samples from each group were examined and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were applied to one specimen from each group, and failures were examined using a stereomicroscope.</p> Results <p>The mean SBS, Ra and Rz values for GC were 21.21 ± 6.15&#xa0;MPa, 5.79 ± 0.58&#xa0;µm and 37.54 ± 6.87&#xa0;µm; GTi1 were 25.80 ± 7.79&#xa0;MPa, 2.69 ± 0.41&#xa0;µm and 26.05 ± 7.60&#xa0;µm; GTi2 were 24.32 ± 7.07&#xa0;MPa, 5.91 ± 0.51&#xa0;µm and 44.46 ± 7.78&#xa0;µm respectively. Although the shear bond strength did not show a significant difference between the groups, the roughness values of the GTi1 group were statistically significantly lower than those of the other groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The roughness values of the GTi2 and GC groups did not show a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p> Conclusions <p>The ceramic bonding of titanium specimens produced by both methods showed values similar to those of Co-Cr and ceramic bonding used in routine treatments.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

In vitro evaluation of bond strength between dental ceramics and titanium frameworks produced by additive and subtractive methods

  • Nergiz Uz,
  • Özer İşisağ,
  • Sevilcan Perçin,
  • Kubilay Aslantaş,
  • Volkan Kılıçlı

摘要

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and titanium substructures produced by different methods.

Methods

After designing 51 disc-shaped samples, three groups were created according to material type and manufacturing method Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) group prepared by selective laser melting (GC), titanium group prepared by milling (GTi1) and titanium group prepared by selective laser melting (GTi2). Surface roughness values (Ra, Rz) of six samples from each group were examined and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were applied to one specimen from each group, and failures were examined using a stereomicroscope.

Results

The mean SBS, Ra and Rz values for GC were 21.21 ± 6.15 MPa, 5.79 ± 0.58 µm and 37.54 ± 6.87 µm; GTi1 were 25.80 ± 7.79 MPa, 2.69 ± 0.41 µm and 26.05 ± 7.60 µm; GTi2 were 24.32 ± 7.07 MPa, 5.91 ± 0.51 µm and 44.46 ± 7.78 µm respectively. Although the shear bond strength did not show a significant difference between the groups, the roughness values of the GTi1 group were statistically significantly lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.05). The roughness values of the GTi2 and GC groups did not show a statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The ceramic bonding of titanium specimens produced by both methods showed values similar to those of Co-Cr and ceramic bonding used in routine treatments.