Scholarlink

Background <p>Different kinds of crowns are used to restore primary teeth. Prefabricated crowns made of zirconia and stainless steel are frequently used. Bioflx crowns are a flexible and attractive substitute that combines the qualities of zirconia and stainless steel.</p> Aim <p>This study aimed to compare BioFLX crowns to stainless-steel crowns regarding surface roughness and wear behavior.</p> Methods <p>Two experimental groups based on the crown material (<i>N</i> = 14/group); group (1): stainless-steel crowns (SSC) and group (2): BioFLX crowns (FLX-C) were compared for surface roughness and wear resistance. Surface roughness was measured using an optical profilometer (white light interferometry, 20X objective lens). For wear measurement, seven primary molars for each group were prepared to receive crowns. Specimens were dynamically loaded (vertical loading, 50&#xa0;N, 1.2&#xa0;Hz) up to 100,000 cycles in a chewing simulator, and then wear volume was measured digitally using color mapping method. Data was analyzed using an independent T-test at a significant level of <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05.</p> Results <p>The FLX-C group had lower mean surface roughness (Ra)than the SSC group, however, the difference was not statistically significant according to the independent T-test (T = 0.704, <i>P</i> = 0.495). The FLX-C group experienced decreased wear volumes compared to the SSC group, with a significant difference between the two groups (T = 4.524, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p> Conclusions <p>Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that, in addition to their aesthetic superiority over SSC, BioFLX crowns have considerable wear resistance under several chewing cycles. Furthermore, their average surface roughness is comparable to that of SSC.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Surface roughness and wear performance of Bioflx versus stainless-steel primary crowns (an in-vitro study)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月5日

查看全文
  • Nancy Mohamed Metwally,
  • Enas A. Elshenawy,
  • Lamis Ahmed Elghareb

摘要

Background

Different kinds of crowns are used to restore primary teeth. Prefabricated crowns made of zirconia and stainless steel are frequently used. Bioflx crowns are a flexible and attractive substitute that combines the qualities of zirconia and stainless steel.

Aim

This study aimed to compare BioFLX crowns to stainless-steel crowns regarding surface roughness and wear behavior.

Methods

Two experimental groups based on the crown material (N = 14/group); group (1): stainless-steel crowns (SSC) and group (2): BioFLX crowns (FLX-C) were compared for surface roughness and wear resistance. Surface roughness was measured using an optical profilometer (white light interferometry, 20X objective lens). For wear measurement, seven primary molars for each group were prepared to receive crowns. Specimens were dynamically loaded (vertical loading, 50 N, 1.2 Hz) up to 100,000 cycles in a chewing simulator, and then wear volume was measured digitally using color mapping method. Data was analyzed using an independent T-test at a significant level of P < 0.05.

Results

The FLX-C group had lower mean surface roughness (Ra)than the SSC group, however, the difference was not statistically significant according to the independent T-test (T = 0.704, P = 0.495). The FLX-C group experienced decreased wear volumes compared to the SSC group, with a significant difference between the two groups (T = 4.524, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that, in addition to their aesthetic superiority over SSC, BioFLX crowns have considerable wear resistance under several chewing cycles. Furthermore, their average surface roughness is comparable to that of SSC.