Scholarlink

Background <p>Height gain in children with growth disorders undergoing recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy shows considerable variability. Predicting treatment outcomes is essential for optimizing individualized treatment strategies.</p> Objective <p>To develop and evaluate a predictive model using clinical data to assess early height growth response in children with growth disorders undergoing rhGH therapy.</p> Methods <p>A total of 786 children were included, randomly split into a derivation cohort (<i>N</i> = 551) and a test cohort (<i>N</i> = 235). Multiple machine learning models were built in the derivation cohort, including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Model performance was evaluated in the test cohort using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and accuracy metrics. Input variables included chronological age, height standard deviation score (HSDS), body mass index standard deviation score (BSDS), IGF-1, and the difference between bone age and chronological age (BA-CA).</p> Results <p>The random forest and MLP models performed best. The random forest model achieved an AUROC of 0.9114 and an AUPRC of 0.8825. The MLP model showed accuracy, precision, specificity, and F1 scores of 0.8468, 0.8208, 0.8583, and 0.8246, respectively. Chronological age, BA-CA, HSDS, and BSDS were the most influential variables. The decision tree identified HSDS ≥ -0.72 as the primary split point.</p> Conclusion <p>Machine learning models, especially random forest and MLP, predict height gain effectively in children receiving rhGH therapy, aiding personalized treatment. Despite MLP’s strong performance, its “black-box” nature may limit clinical adoption. Future work should focus on enhancing model interpretability.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Construction and evaluation of a height prediction model for children with growth disorders treated with recombinant human growth hormone

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月9日

查看全文
  • Feng Zhu,
  • Anle Wu,
  • Lingling Chen,
  • Ya Xia,
  • Xiaoju Luo,
  • Jieqian Zhu,
  • Lina Huang,
  • Yu Zhang

摘要

Background

Height gain in children with growth disorders undergoing recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy shows considerable variability. Predicting treatment outcomes is essential for optimizing individualized treatment strategies.

Objective

To develop and evaluate a predictive model using clinical data to assess early height growth response in children with growth disorders undergoing rhGH therapy.

Methods

A total of 786 children were included, randomly split into a derivation cohort (N = 551) and a test cohort (N = 235). Multiple machine learning models were built in the derivation cohort, including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Model performance was evaluated in the test cohort using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and accuracy metrics. Input variables included chronological age, height standard deviation score (HSDS), body mass index standard deviation score (BSDS), IGF-1, and the difference between bone age and chronological age (BA-CA).

Results

The random forest and MLP models performed best. The random forest model achieved an AUROC of 0.9114 and an AUPRC of 0.8825. The MLP model showed accuracy, precision, specificity, and F1 scores of 0.8468, 0.8208, 0.8583, and 0.8246, respectively. Chronological age, BA-CA, HSDS, and BSDS were the most influential variables. The decision tree identified HSDS ≥ -0.72 as the primary split point.

Conclusion

Machine learning models, especially random forest and MLP, predict height gain effectively in children receiving rhGH therapy, aiding personalized treatment. Despite MLP’s strong performance, its “black-box” nature may limit clinical adoption. Future work should focus on enhancing model interpretability.