Background <p>For patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement (LUTS/BPE), assessing patient risk of disease progression is important to determine if treatment with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) is warranted. Clinical trials and guidelines have identified risk factors for disease progression, which affects subsequent treatment decision making; however, real-world clinical practices may differ. This non-interventional, cross-sectional study examined the management of patients with LUTS/BPE at risk of disease progression receiving 5ARIs by urologists from Spain and Brazil.</p> Methods <p>Urologists were randomly recruited and completed an online questionnaire comprising multiple-choice, open-ended ranking and rating questions on their clinical approach in patients with LUTS/BPE receiving 5ARIs. Urologists also provided patient record forms for two recent patients treated with 5ARIs.</p> Results <p>In Spain and Brazil (<i>n</i> = 100 each), 66% and 75% of urologists, respectively, assessed patients for their risk of LUTS/BPE progression. The most frequent parameters used to assess risk of progression were: post-void residual volume (PVR: 79% Spain, 83% Brazil), prostate volume (PV: 78% Spain, 82% Brazil), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS: 79% Spain, 79% Brazil). These were also the most frequent parameters considered before initiating 5ARIs: PVR (60% Spain, 78% Brazil); PV (87% Spain, 89% Brazil); and IPSS (66% Spain, 61% Brazil). Thresholds used to assess risk factors of disease progression were generally higher than recommended by clinical guidelines. Reasons for initiating 5ARIs included: to achieve sustained symptom relief (70% Spain, 71% Brazil) and reduce the risk of progression (63% Spain, 66% Brazil). Impact on sexual function was a barrier to 5ARI initiation (46% Spain, 67% Brazil).</p> Conclusions <p>Most urologists in Spain and Brazil recognized the benefits of assessing the risk of disease progression in patients with LUTS/BPE. Many urologists reported assessing fewer risk factors and using higher thresholds than recommended by international guidelines, highlighting the need for ongoing medical education.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement at risk of progression treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors: examining real-world clinical practice in Spain and Brazil

  • Juan Manuel Palacios,
  • Pratiksha Kapse,
  • Vanessa Cortés,
  • Marcio Augusto Averbeck,
  • Alberto Budia Alba,
  • Danilo Souza Lima da Costa Cruz,
  • Suryakant Somvanshi,
  • Fiona Pereira

摘要

Background

For patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement (LUTS/BPE), assessing patient risk of disease progression is important to determine if treatment with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) is warranted. Clinical trials and guidelines have identified risk factors for disease progression, which affects subsequent treatment decision making; however, real-world clinical practices may differ. This non-interventional, cross-sectional study examined the management of patients with LUTS/BPE at risk of disease progression receiving 5ARIs by urologists from Spain and Brazil.

Methods

Urologists were randomly recruited and completed an online questionnaire comprising multiple-choice, open-ended ranking and rating questions on their clinical approach in patients with LUTS/BPE receiving 5ARIs. Urologists also provided patient record forms for two recent patients treated with 5ARIs.

Results

In Spain and Brazil (n = 100 each), 66% and 75% of urologists, respectively, assessed patients for their risk of LUTS/BPE progression. The most frequent parameters used to assess risk of progression were: post-void residual volume (PVR: 79% Spain, 83% Brazil), prostate volume (PV: 78% Spain, 82% Brazil), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS: 79% Spain, 79% Brazil). These were also the most frequent parameters considered before initiating 5ARIs: PVR (60% Spain, 78% Brazil); PV (87% Spain, 89% Brazil); and IPSS (66% Spain, 61% Brazil). Thresholds used to assess risk factors of disease progression were generally higher than recommended by clinical guidelines. Reasons for initiating 5ARIs included: to achieve sustained symptom relief (70% Spain, 71% Brazil) and reduce the risk of progression (63% Spain, 66% Brazil). Impact on sexual function was a barrier to 5ARI initiation (46% Spain, 67% Brazil).

Conclusions

Most urologists in Spain and Brazil recognized the benefits of assessing the risk of disease progression in patients with LUTS/BPE. Many urologists reported assessing fewer risk factors and using higher thresholds than recommended by international guidelines, highlighting the need for ongoing medical education.