Background <p>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has advanced minimally invasive urology. However, the absence of haptic feedback may increase the risk of tissue trauma. This case series evaluates a no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty to minimize urothelial handling and assess its feasibility and short-term outcomes.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective case series reviewed 20 pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with robotic-assisted pyeloplasty between 2019 and 2022. In 10 cases, a no-touch urothelium approach was applied to minimize direct tissue handling. Patient selection, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were documented.</p> Results <p>The no-touch approach was successfully implemented in all cases without intraoperative complications. Median console time was 98&#xa0;min (IQR: 81–131). Postoperative outcomes were favorable, with significant improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis in all cases. No major complications occurred, and no anastomotic strictures were observed during follow-up.</p> Conclusions <p>The no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty is a feasible approach that maintains surgical efficiency while minimizing direct urothelial handling. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to validate its potential benefits.</p> Trial registration <p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital (permit nr 5485), Finland.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Enhancing pediatric robotic pyeloplasty with a no-touch urothelium approach: a case series

  • Niklas Pakkasjärvi,
  • Pyry Jaakkola,
  • Liisi Ripatti,
  • Seppo Taskinen

摘要

Background

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has advanced minimally invasive urology. However, the absence of haptic feedback may increase the risk of tissue trauma. This case series evaluates a no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty to minimize urothelial handling and assess its feasibility and short-term outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective case series reviewed 20 pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with robotic-assisted pyeloplasty between 2019 and 2022. In 10 cases, a no-touch urothelium approach was applied to minimize direct tissue handling. Patient selection, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were documented.

Results

The no-touch approach was successfully implemented in all cases without intraoperative complications. Median console time was 98 min (IQR: 81–131). Postoperative outcomes were favorable, with significant improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis in all cases. No major complications occurred, and no anastomotic strictures were observed during follow-up.

Conclusions

The no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty is a feasible approach that maintains surgical efficiency while minimizing direct urothelial handling. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to validate its potential benefits.

Trial registration

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital (permit nr 5485), Finland.