Background <p>Pineal region hemangioblastoma(PR-HB) is an exceptionally rare vascular tumor, often misdiagnosed due to overlap with more common pineal lesions. Accurate identification is essential for safe surgical management.</p> Case presentation <p>We report a 54-year-old woman presenting with acute dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. MRI revealed a vividly enhancing pineal mass with prominent flow voids causing obstructive hydrocephalus. The tumor was removed via a left paramedian supracerebellar infratentorial approach, achieving gross-total resection. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed hemangioblastoma (inhibin-α positive, PAX8 negative). The patient recovered uneventfully, and no recurrence was observed at 12-month follow-up.</p> Discussion <p>Although extremely rare, pineal hemangioblastoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hypervascular pineal masses. Review of previously published cases demonstrates consistent radiological features, diagnostic pitfalls, surgical considerations, and the importance of distinguishing hemangioblastoma from metastatic renal cell carcinoma.</p> Conclusion <p>Pineal hemangioblastoma is a surgically curable entity. Recognition of its imaging and immunohistochemical characteristics facilitates safe resection and accurate diagnosis.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Pineal region hemangioblastoma: a case report and literature review

  • Bo Tan,
  • Yuyuan Li,
  • Xingrong Zhang,
  • Bin Yang,
  • Yaohui Huang,
  • Xiaohong Yin

摘要

Background

Pineal region hemangioblastoma(PR-HB) is an exceptionally rare vascular tumor, often misdiagnosed due to overlap with more common pineal lesions. Accurate identification is essential for safe surgical management.

Case presentation

We report a 54-year-old woman presenting with acute dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. MRI revealed a vividly enhancing pineal mass with prominent flow voids causing obstructive hydrocephalus. The tumor was removed via a left paramedian supracerebellar infratentorial approach, achieving gross-total resection. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed hemangioblastoma (inhibin-α positive, PAX8 negative). The patient recovered uneventfully, and no recurrence was observed at 12-month follow-up.

Discussion

Although extremely rare, pineal hemangioblastoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hypervascular pineal masses. Review of previously published cases demonstrates consistent radiological features, diagnostic pitfalls, surgical considerations, and the importance of distinguishing hemangioblastoma from metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

Pineal hemangioblastoma is a surgically curable entity. Recognition of its imaging and immunohistochemical characteristics facilitates safe resection and accurate diagnosis.