Aim <p>We aimed to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of the available evidence about the association between dietary acid load (DAL) and fractures in adults.</p> Method <p>Relevant studies were searched through Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar until October 2024. The random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated by statistical test of Egger. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study confounders. Moreover, the quality of studies was asessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale which is designed for observational studies.</p> Results <p>Six studies were included in this review. According to the methodological heterogeneity between studies and their different charactristics, we performed the analysis based on random-effect model that indicated a marginally significant association between DAL and risk of fracture (N event = 5275, Pooled OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99–1.21, <i>P</i> = 0.073) (I<sup>2</sup> = 12.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.321). According to subgroup analysis, there was no significant association between DAL and risk of fracture in the cross-sectional effect sizes (N event = 337, OR:0.69; 95%CI:0.47–1.00). There was a significant association between DAL and a greater risk of fracture in cohort studies (N event = 4938, OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03–1.22, <i>P</i> = 0.006). Also, high-quality studies (OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03–1.22; <i>P</i> = 0.006) showed a significant association between DAL and fracture risk.</p> Conclusion <p>DAL was marginally related to a higher risk of fracture. This finding is a trigger for bone health management with a healthy balanced dietary intake.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Association between dietary acid load and risk of osteoporotic fractures in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

  • Atieh Mirzababaei,
  • Mojtaba Daneshvar,
  • Vahid Basirat,
  • Omid Asbaghi,
  • Elnaz Daneshzad

摘要

Aim

We aimed to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of the available evidence about the association between dietary acid load (DAL) and fractures in adults.

Method

Relevant studies were searched through Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar until October 2024. The random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated by statistical test of Egger. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study confounders. Moreover, the quality of studies was asessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale which is designed for observational studies.

Results

Six studies were included in this review. According to the methodological heterogeneity between studies and their different charactristics, we performed the analysis based on random-effect model that indicated a marginally significant association between DAL and risk of fracture (N event = 5275, Pooled OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99–1.21, P = 0.073) (I2 = 12.9%; P = 0.321). According to subgroup analysis, there was no significant association between DAL and risk of fracture in the cross-sectional effect sizes (N event = 337, OR:0.69; 95%CI:0.47–1.00). There was a significant association between DAL and a greater risk of fracture in cohort studies (N event = 4938, OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03–1.22, P = 0.006). Also, high-quality studies (OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03–1.22; P = 0.006) showed a significant association between DAL and fracture risk.

Conclusion

DAL was marginally related to a higher risk of fracture. This finding is a trigger for bone health management with a healthy balanced dietary intake.