Scholarlink

Background <p>England’s ‘Swap to Stop’ programme provides local authorities with free vape starter kits for adults who smoke. This study aimed to evaluate the reach, uptake, and correlates of engagement with Swap to Stop within the first year after the start of implementation.</p> Methods <p>Our sample were adults (<i>n</i> = 2009) who currently smoke or recently stopped smoking from the England arm of the 2024 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. We calculated weighted proportions for Swap to Stop awareness, offer, interest, and participation, and reasons for no interest/participation. We performed weighted binary logistic regressions to explore associations between sociodemographics, health, smoking cessation attempts, and vaping status and Swap to Stop awareness, offer, and interest/participation, and between interest/participation and vaping harm perceptions.</p> Results <p>Overall, 11.0% had heard of Swap to Stop, of whom 43.6% were offered to take part. Among those offered, 63.2% had participated; among those not offered, 55.1% were interested. The most common reasons for no interest/participation were not being interested in vapes (60.7%) and believing them to be unsafe (57.5%) or no less harmful than smoking (56.6%). Awareness was higher among non-White than White participants (AOR = 1.86), those with high (AOR = 1.78) and medium (AOR = 1.89) than lower incomes, and those who did than did not currently vape (AOR = 3.44), and lower among women than men (AOR = 0.57) and those aged ≥ 40 than ≤ 24 years (AOR = 0.28) and 25–39 years (AOR = 0.34). Offer of participation was also lower among those aged ≥ 40 years (AOR = 0.06 vs. ≤24 years, AOR = 0.21 vs. 25–39 years). Interest/participation was higher among people with than without prior smoking cessation attempts (AOR = 2.52) and among people who were than were not currently vaping (AOR = 4.50), and lower among women than men (AOR = 0.32). Interest/participation was associated with perceiving vaping as less harmful than smoking (AOR = 2.61).</p> Conclusion <p>Within its first year, across England, awareness of Swap to Stop was limited, though uptake and interest in the programme were high. Awareness may have been higher in areas that adopted the programme early and may increase with maturation. Targeted outreach and communication on the relative harms of vaping is key to maximising public health impact.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Awareness and use of a free vapes programme for smoking cessation in England: findings from the 2024 ITC 4 Country Smoking and Vaping Survey

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月5日

查看全文
  • Martine Skumlien,
  • Katherine A East,
  • Erikas Simonavičius,
  • Andrew Hyland,
  • Geoffrey T Fong,
  • Grace Li,
  • Anne C K Quah,
  • Christian Boudreau,
  • Ann McNeill,
  • Leonie Brose

摘要

Background

England’s ‘Swap to Stop’ programme provides local authorities with free vape starter kits for adults who smoke. This study aimed to evaluate the reach, uptake, and correlates of engagement with Swap to Stop within the first year after the start of implementation.

Methods

Our sample were adults (n = 2009) who currently smoke or recently stopped smoking from the England arm of the 2024 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. We calculated weighted proportions for Swap to Stop awareness, offer, interest, and participation, and reasons for no interest/participation. We performed weighted binary logistic regressions to explore associations between sociodemographics, health, smoking cessation attempts, and vaping status and Swap to Stop awareness, offer, and interest/participation, and between interest/participation and vaping harm perceptions.

Results

Overall, 11.0% had heard of Swap to Stop, of whom 43.6% were offered to take part. Among those offered, 63.2% had participated; among those not offered, 55.1% were interested. The most common reasons for no interest/participation were not being interested in vapes (60.7%) and believing them to be unsafe (57.5%) or no less harmful than smoking (56.6%). Awareness was higher among non-White than White participants (AOR = 1.86), those with high (AOR = 1.78) and medium (AOR = 1.89) than lower incomes, and those who did than did not currently vape (AOR = 3.44), and lower among women than men (AOR = 0.57) and those aged ≥ 40 than ≤ 24 years (AOR = 0.28) and 25–39 years (AOR = 0.34). Offer of participation was also lower among those aged ≥ 40 years (AOR = 0.06 vs. ≤24 years, AOR = 0.21 vs. 25–39 years). Interest/participation was higher among people with than without prior smoking cessation attempts (AOR = 2.52) and among people who were than were not currently vaping (AOR = 4.50), and lower among women than men (AOR = 0.32). Interest/participation was associated with perceiving vaping as less harmful than smoking (AOR = 2.61).

Conclusion

Within its first year, across England, awareness of Swap to Stop was limited, though uptake and interest in the programme were high. Awareness may have been higher in areas that adopted the programme early and may increase with maturation. Targeted outreach and communication on the relative harms of vaping is key to maximising public health impact.