Scholarlink

Background <p>Policy implications are seldom more than a paragraph or two at the end of empirical papers. The aim was therefore to explore social determinants of mental health across life through qualitative analysis of meta-synthesis of empirical publications from a 27-year school-leaver cohort. From the actionable empirical results, we suggest policies for primary prevention aimed at equitable mental health across life.</p> Methods <p>Empirical data was taken from two qualitative meta-syntheses which integrate findings from 79 empirical papers based on a longstanding Swedish school-leaver study about determinants of mental health during life. Summative content analysis guided our approach to further synthesize the findings from the meta-syntheses into actionable key themes.</p> Results <p>We suggest possible contextualised polices based on the following ten key themes: (1) Unemployment can cause poor mental health. (2) Active labour market programs may counteract poor mental health. (3) Temporary employment is detrimental to mental health. (4) Good school climate could be protective against later mental health symptoms. (5) Poor working conditions are related to poor mental health. (6) Material and social adversities can cause poor mental health. (7) Gender inequities in working life are related to poor mental health. (8) Gender inequities in private life are related to poor mental health. (9) Poor social support is detrimental to mental health. (10) Disadvantaged neighbourhood seem to have a weak but consistently negative impact on mental health.</p> Conclusion <p>Our qualitative analyses of cohort data, with a broad life-course approach, synthesised actionable results from which we identified evidence-based policies for improved and equitable mental health from adolescence until midlife. We encourage further systematisation of evidence-based public health policies in other contexts, including the ongoing marketisation and underfunding of the welfare sector in high-income countries.</p> <p>Funding supporting health equities and allocations by needs should be regarded as investments in sustainability. </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Policy implications for improved and equitable mental health – the Swedish case: a summative content analysis of findings across 26 years from two qualitative meta-syntheses

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月2日

查看全文
  • Anne Hammarström,
  • Per-Olof Östergren,
  • Gunnar Ågren,
  • Urban Janlert,
  • Hugo Westerlund,
  • Maria Albin

摘要

Background

Policy implications are seldom more than a paragraph or two at the end of empirical papers. The aim was therefore to explore social determinants of mental health across life through qualitative analysis of meta-synthesis of empirical publications from a 27-year school-leaver cohort. From the actionable empirical results, we suggest policies for primary prevention aimed at equitable mental health across life.

Methods

Empirical data was taken from two qualitative meta-syntheses which integrate findings from 79 empirical papers based on a longstanding Swedish school-leaver study about determinants of mental health during life. Summative content analysis guided our approach to further synthesize the findings from the meta-syntheses into actionable key themes.

Results

We suggest possible contextualised polices based on the following ten key themes: (1) Unemployment can cause poor mental health. (2) Active labour market programs may counteract poor mental health. (3) Temporary employment is detrimental to mental health. (4) Good school climate could be protective against later mental health symptoms. (5) Poor working conditions are related to poor mental health. (6) Material and social adversities can cause poor mental health. (7) Gender inequities in working life are related to poor mental health. (8) Gender inequities in private life are related to poor mental health. (9) Poor social support is detrimental to mental health. (10) Disadvantaged neighbourhood seem to have a weak but consistently negative impact on mental health.

Conclusion

Our qualitative analyses of cohort data, with a broad life-course approach, synthesised actionable results from which we identified evidence-based policies for improved and equitable mental health from adolescence until midlife. We encourage further systematisation of evidence-based public health policies in other contexts, including the ongoing marketisation and underfunding of the welfare sector in high-income countries.

Funding supporting health equities and allocations by needs should be regarded as investments in sustainability.