Introduction <p>Sub-Saharan African countries possess rich mineral resources that offer socio-economic development opportunities for mining communities. However, the prioritization of health and wellbeing impacts during the mining life cycle remains unclear. This review examines the focus on health and wellbeing in mining communities within the sub-Saharan African context.</p> Methods <p>An online literature search was conducted across four databases (Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science) using the PICOS framework for eligibility criteria. The Rayyan tool was used for screening and data extraction.</p> Results <p>45 studies were included (20 qualitative, 25 quantitative, including mixed methods). Most studies were from South Africa. Health impacts identified included: (a) HIV/AIDS, (b) Tuberculosis (TB), (c) Hypertension, and (d) Health Impact Assessment (HIA). The study also explored the mining life cycle stages—Exploration, Development, Production, and Closure—focusing on health and wellbeing prioritization.</p> Conclusions <p>While mining offers socio-economic benefits, health and wellbeing impacts are not prioritized, especially in the exploration stage. Tools like HIAs provide valuable insights, but mining communities continue to face health challenges, both positive and negative.</p> PROSPERO <p>: CRD42023474494.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Exploring prioritization of wellbeing and health impacts for mining communities during the mining life cycle within the sub-Saharan Africa context: a systematic review

  • Josephine N. Pieters,
  • Nomsa S. Ndaba,
  • Sanele Ngcobo

摘要

Introduction

Sub-Saharan African countries possess rich mineral resources that offer socio-economic development opportunities for mining communities. However, the prioritization of health and wellbeing impacts during the mining life cycle remains unclear. This review examines the focus on health and wellbeing in mining communities within the sub-Saharan African context.

Methods

An online literature search was conducted across four databases (Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science) using the PICOS framework for eligibility criteria. The Rayyan tool was used for screening and data extraction.

Results

45 studies were included (20 qualitative, 25 quantitative, including mixed methods). Most studies were from South Africa. Health impacts identified included: (a) HIV/AIDS, (b) Tuberculosis (TB), (c) Hypertension, and (d) Health Impact Assessment (HIA). The study also explored the mining life cycle stages—Exploration, Development, Production, and Closure—focusing on health and wellbeing prioritization.

Conclusions

While mining offers socio-economic benefits, health and wellbeing impacts are not prioritized, especially in the exploration stage. Tools like HIAs provide valuable insights, but mining communities continue to face health challenges, both positive and negative.

PROSPERO

: CRD42023474494.