Background <p>Depression rates surge during adolescence. Early identification of youth at increased risk for depression is crucial for timely intervention and, ideally, prevention. This study aims to improve the prediction of future depressive symptoms in adolescents by using a multimodal approach that integrates relevant clinical, demographic, behavioral, and neural characteristics.</p> Methods <p>103 adolescents (ages 12–18; 72.8% female) underwent a baseline assessment including self-report questionnaires, ecological momentary assessment, a clinical interview, and behavioral and neural measures of reward responsiveness. We used nested cross-validation to compare machine learning approaches as well as conventional linear regression in predicting depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] and the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire [MFQ]) at a 3-month follow-up.</p> Results <p>For the prediction of CES-D depression scores, the best performing model was a multivariable linear regression using as predictors five principal component scores from a principal component analysis of baseline variables (RMSE = 6.501, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.688). For the MFQ, the best performing model was a univariable linear regression with baseline MFQ scores as the sole predictor (RMSE = 8.054, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.671). A factor analysis revealed that items assessing melancholic features were most predictive of future depressive symptoms.</p> Conclusion <p>More complex machine learning approaches did not outperform regression in predicting future depressive symptoms. The integration of relevant multimodal predictors reveals which adolescent characteristics (e.g., melancholic features and physical anxiety) have a larger contribution to predicting short-term future depressive symptoms. Future studies are needed with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to provide a more comprehensive test of such models.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Multimodal prediction of future depressive symptoms in adolescents

  • Linshanshan Wang,
  • Ningxuan Zhou,
  • Nigel M. Jaffe,
  • Kristina Pidvirny,
  • Anna O. Tierney,
  • Hadar B. Fisher,
  • Francesca Morfini,
  • Erika E. Forbes,
  • Diego A. Pizzagalli,
  • Tianxi Cai,
  • Christian A. Webb

摘要

Background

Depression rates surge during adolescence. Early identification of youth at increased risk for depression is crucial for timely intervention and, ideally, prevention. This study aims to improve the prediction of future depressive symptoms in adolescents by using a multimodal approach that integrates relevant clinical, demographic, behavioral, and neural characteristics.

Methods

103 adolescents (ages 12–18; 72.8% female) underwent a baseline assessment including self-report questionnaires, ecological momentary assessment, a clinical interview, and behavioral and neural measures of reward responsiveness. We used nested cross-validation to compare machine learning approaches as well as conventional linear regression in predicting depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] and the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire [MFQ]) at a 3-month follow-up.

Results

For the prediction of CES-D depression scores, the best performing model was a multivariable linear regression using as predictors five principal component scores from a principal component analysis of baseline variables (RMSE = 6.501, R2 = 0.688). For the MFQ, the best performing model was a univariable linear regression with baseline MFQ scores as the sole predictor (RMSE = 8.054, R2 = 0.671). A factor analysis revealed that items assessing melancholic features were most predictive of future depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

More complex machine learning approaches did not outperform regression in predicting future depressive symptoms. The integration of relevant multimodal predictors reveals which adolescent characteristics (e.g., melancholic features and physical anxiety) have a larger contribution to predicting short-term future depressive symptoms. Future studies are needed with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to provide a more comprehensive test of such models.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.