Scholarlink

Background <p>Difficulties in cognitive control over negative emotional stimuli are a key characteristic of depression. The Expected Value of Control (EVC) provides a framework for understanding how cognitive control is allocated, focusing on the motivational factors of efficacy and reward. Efficacy is the likelihood that an effort will result in a specific result, while reward is the value assigned to that outcome. However, the impact of emotion on the estimation of EVC has not been explored. We investigated the interplay between emotion and motivation, using the EVC theoretical framework, in depression.</p> Methods <p>We utilized a within-between-subject design. The subjects were healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 31) and those with depression (<i>n</i> = 36), who underwent a clinical diagnostic interview, completed the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and participated in an incentivized Emotional Stroop Paradigm, whereby participants received cues indicating different levels of efficacy (low vs. high) and reward (low vs. high) prior to the targeted stimuli.</p> Results <p>Significant interactions were detected between a) group × emotional valence × efficacy, and b) group × reward regarding accuracy rates on the Emotional Stroop Task. Follow-up analyses revealed that during high-efficacy trials, the Control group demonstrated significantly greater accuracy than the Depressed group for both positive and neutral stimuli. In low-efficacy trials, the Controls were also significantly more accurate than the Depressed group when responding to negative stimuli. Additionally, the Depressed group performed significantly worse than Controls on high-reward trials, no significant difference was detected between the two groups on low-reward trials.</p> Conclusion <p>The emotional valence of stimuli can influence the assessment of reward efficacy, and individuals with depression may have difficulties focusing on reward cues. Further research is necessary to incorporate emotion into the EVC framework.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Understanding cognitive control in depression: the interactive role of emotion, expected efficacy and reward

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月21日

查看全文
  • Mostafa Toobaei,
  • Mohammadreza Taghavi,
  • Laura Jobson

摘要

Background

Difficulties in cognitive control over negative emotional stimuli are a key characteristic of depression. The Expected Value of Control (EVC) provides a framework for understanding how cognitive control is allocated, focusing on the motivational factors of efficacy and reward. Efficacy is the likelihood that an effort will result in a specific result, while reward is the value assigned to that outcome. However, the impact of emotion on the estimation of EVC has not been explored. We investigated the interplay between emotion and motivation, using the EVC theoretical framework, in depression.

Methods

We utilized a within-between-subject design. The subjects were healthy controls (n = 31) and those with depression (n = 36), who underwent a clinical diagnostic interview, completed the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and participated in an incentivized Emotional Stroop Paradigm, whereby participants received cues indicating different levels of efficacy (low vs. high) and reward (low vs. high) prior to the targeted stimuli.

Results

Significant interactions were detected between a) group × emotional valence × efficacy, and b) group × reward regarding accuracy rates on the Emotional Stroop Task. Follow-up analyses revealed that during high-efficacy trials, the Control group demonstrated significantly greater accuracy than the Depressed group for both positive and neutral stimuli. In low-efficacy trials, the Controls were also significantly more accurate than the Depressed group when responding to negative stimuli. Additionally, the Depressed group performed significantly worse than Controls on high-reward trials, no significant difference was detected between the two groups on low-reward trials.

Conclusion

The emotional valence of stimuli can influence the assessment of reward efficacy, and individuals with depression may have difficulties focusing on reward cues. Further research is necessary to incorporate emotion into the EVC framework.