Objective <p>To construct and validate a predictive model to better differentiate the survival outcomes for locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).</p> Methods <p>Patients were separately classified as vaginal invasion (VI), parametrial invasion (PI) or lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on disease extension. The survival outcomes were compared. Cox regression were performed to identify risk factors. Accordingly, the nomogram was constructed and validated. Moreover, the predictive performance between model and 2018 FIGO staging system was compared.</p> Results <p>LNM could significantly impair the survival for patients with VI (5-yr OS:77.7% VS 95.6%) (<i>P</i> = 0.018). Patients with bilateral extension to pelvic sidewall (BEP) and bilateral parametrial invasion (BPI) showed worse 5-yr OS (42.4% and 60.9%) compared to those with unilateral extension to pelvic sidewall (UEP) and unilateral parametrial invasion (UPI) (81.7% and 89.1%) (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, LNM didn’t affect the prognosis of patients with PI. The nomogram incorporating pathology, PI and pelvic LNM was constructed and showed decent predictive performance both in the training and test cohort. Besides, nomogram possessed better predictive ability than 2018 FIGO staging system both in the training (5-yr AUC: 0.79 VS 0.59) and validation cohort (5-yr AUC: 0.77 VS 0.64).</p> Conclusions <p>LNM would impair the survival for patients with VI not those with PI and a nomogram was constructed and validated to better differentiate the prognosis for LACC patients than FIGO staging system.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Reappraisal of the prognostic significance of vaginal invasion, parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a multi-center large cohort study

  • Xi-Lin Yang,
  • Jian-Li He,
  • Tie-Jun Wang,
  • Li Ran,
  • Li-Juan Zou,
  • Xiao-Ge Sun,
  • Xiao-Mei Li,
  • Zi Liu,
  • Yong-Gang Shi,
  • Sha Li,
  • Feng-Ju Zhao,
  • Kun Gao,
  • Wei Zhong,
  • Guang-Hui Cheng,
  • Ya-Li Gao,
  • Bao-Sheng Sun,
  • Jun-Fang Yan,
  • Li-Chun Wei,
  • Fu-Quan Zhang

摘要

Objective

To construct and validate a predictive model to better differentiate the survival outcomes for locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods

Patients were separately classified as vaginal invasion (VI), parametrial invasion (PI) or lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on disease extension. The survival outcomes were compared. Cox regression were performed to identify risk factors. Accordingly, the nomogram was constructed and validated. Moreover, the predictive performance between model and 2018 FIGO staging system was compared.

Results

LNM could significantly impair the survival for patients with VI (5-yr OS:77.7% VS 95.6%) (P = 0.018). Patients with bilateral extension to pelvic sidewall (BEP) and bilateral parametrial invasion (BPI) showed worse 5-yr OS (42.4% and 60.9%) compared to those with unilateral extension to pelvic sidewall (UEP) and unilateral parametrial invasion (UPI) (81.7% and 89.1%) (P < 0.001). Additionally, LNM didn’t affect the prognosis of patients with PI. The nomogram incorporating pathology, PI and pelvic LNM was constructed and showed decent predictive performance both in the training and test cohort. Besides, nomogram possessed better predictive ability than 2018 FIGO staging system both in the training (5-yr AUC: 0.79 VS 0.59) and validation cohort (5-yr AUC: 0.77 VS 0.64).

Conclusions

LNM would impair the survival for patients with VI not those with PI and a nomogram was constructed and validated to better differentiate the prognosis for LACC patients than FIGO staging system.