Purpose <p>This study aimed to determine whether the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or invasive cribriform carcinoma correlates with homologous recombination repair or mismatch repair gene alterations in patients with prostate cancer who have not undergone prior systemic treatment.</p> Materials and methods <p>We conducted a retrospective review of 347 systemic treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients who underwent genomic testing between January 2018 and May 2024 at a single tertiary center. Clinical and genomic characteristics were compared between groups with and without intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or invasive cribriform carcinoma. Predictive factors for homologous recombination repair gene mutations were identified through logistic regression.</p> Results <p>Among the study population, 73.2% demonstrated intraductal or cribriform histologic features. Mutations in homologous recombination repair genes were detected in 24.8% of those with these features, and in 22.6% of those without. Mutations in mismatch repair genes occurred in 2.8% and 1.1% of the respective groups. No differences were observed in prostate-specific antigen levels, microsatellite instability, or tumor mutational burden. Logistic regression analysis identified Grade Groups (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and younger age at diagnosis (<i>P</i> = 0.041) as significant predictors of homologous recombination repair gene alterations. The presence of intraductal or cribriform patterns, however, did not predict such mutations (<i>P</i> = 0.827).</p> Conclusion <p>The presence of intraductal carcinoma or cribriform growth patterns was not associated with increased likelihood of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes. These findings support the use of clinical parameters such as age and Grade Group, rather than histologic subtype alone, in guiding decisions for genetic testing.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of intraductal carcinoma and invasive cribriform carcinoma as predictors of genetic mutations in systemic treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients

  • Sangmin Lee,
  • Inkeun Park,
  • Bokyung Ahn,
  • Bumjin Lim,
  • Jung Kwon Kim,
  • Dalsan You,
  • In Gab Jeong,
  • Jun Hyuk Hong,
  • Hanjong Ahn,
  • Jungyo Suh

摘要

Purpose

This study aimed to determine whether the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or invasive cribriform carcinoma correlates with homologous recombination repair or mismatch repair gene alterations in patients with prostate cancer who have not undergone prior systemic treatment.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 347 systemic treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients who underwent genomic testing between January 2018 and May 2024 at a single tertiary center. Clinical and genomic characteristics were compared between groups with and without intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or invasive cribriform carcinoma. Predictive factors for homologous recombination repair gene mutations were identified through logistic regression.

Results

Among the study population, 73.2% demonstrated intraductal or cribriform histologic features. Mutations in homologous recombination repair genes were detected in 24.8% of those with these features, and in 22.6% of those without. Mutations in mismatch repair genes occurred in 2.8% and 1.1% of the respective groups. No differences were observed in prostate-specific antigen levels, microsatellite instability, or tumor mutational burden. Logistic regression analysis identified Grade Groups (P < 0.001) and younger age at diagnosis (P = 0.041) as significant predictors of homologous recombination repair gene alterations. The presence of intraductal or cribriform patterns, however, did not predict such mutations (P = 0.827).

Conclusion

The presence of intraductal carcinoma or cribriform growth patterns was not associated with increased likelihood of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes. These findings support the use of clinical parameters such as age and Grade Group, rather than histologic subtype alone, in guiding decisions for genetic testing.