Background <p>Inflammatory responses, immune status, and nutritional conditions are critical determinants of tumor progression and treatment outcomes in rectal cancer. However, the prognostic value of integrated inflammatory-nutritional scores, including the modified Gustave Roussy Immune (mGRIm) score and modified Naples Prognostic Score (M-NPS), remains underexplored in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of these scores and to develop a nomogram for identifying patient groups who may benefit from nCRT.</p> Methods <p>A retrospective cohort study analyzed 157 rectal cancer patients who received nCRT, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy at a single institution. The mGRIm score (based on lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], serum albumin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR]) and M-NPS (incorporating albumin, total cholesterol, NLR, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio [LMR]) were calculated. Patients were stratified into high- and low-score groups based on these prognostic scores. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A nomogram integrating independent prognostic factors was developed and validated.</p> Results <p>High mGRIm and M-NPS scores were significantly associated with worse OS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and PFS (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor length &gt; 5&#xa0;cm, pre-radiotherapy metastasis, and high M-NPS as independent predictors of OS, while high mGRIm, advanced N stage, and metastasis predicted inferior PFS. The nomogram demonstrated robust predictive accuracy for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS (AUC: 0.790, 0.739, 0.708) and PFS (AUC: 0.763, 0.727, 0.786), with excellent calibration.</p> Conclusion <p>The mGRIm score and M-NPS are independent prognostic indicators for rectal cancer patients receiving nCRT. The novel nomogram, integrating these biomarker scores with clinical staging parameters, enables the quantification of individual prognosis before treatment initiation and facilitates the identification of optimal nCRT candidates through multivariable probability estimation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Prognostic value of integrated inflammatory-nutritional evaluation in neoadjuvant-treated rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis

  • Mei Wang,
  • Xiaoke Di,
  • Sheng Zhang,
  • Fei Li,
  • Meng Tian,
  • Minghui Zhao,
  • Linhong Jiang,
  • Xinchen Sun,
  • Jia Liu

摘要

Background

Inflammatory responses, immune status, and nutritional conditions are critical determinants of tumor progression and treatment outcomes in rectal cancer. However, the prognostic value of integrated inflammatory-nutritional scores, including the modified Gustave Roussy Immune (mGRIm) score and modified Naples Prognostic Score (M-NPS), remains underexplored in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of these scores and to develop a nomogram for identifying patient groups who may benefit from nCRT.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study analyzed 157 rectal cancer patients who received nCRT, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy at a single institution. The mGRIm score (based on lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], serum albumin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR]) and M-NPS (incorporating albumin, total cholesterol, NLR, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio [LMR]) were calculated. Patients were stratified into high- and low-score groups based on these prognostic scores. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A nomogram integrating independent prognostic factors was developed and validated.

Results

High mGRIm and M-NPS scores were significantly associated with worse OS (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) and PFS (both p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor length > 5 cm, pre-radiotherapy metastasis, and high M-NPS as independent predictors of OS, while high mGRIm, advanced N stage, and metastasis predicted inferior PFS. The nomogram demonstrated robust predictive accuracy for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS (AUC: 0.790, 0.739, 0.708) and PFS (AUC: 0.763, 0.727, 0.786), with excellent calibration.

Conclusion

The mGRIm score and M-NPS are independent prognostic indicators for rectal cancer patients receiving nCRT. The novel nomogram, integrating these biomarker scores with clinical staging parameters, enables the quantification of individual prognosis before treatment initiation and facilitates the identification of optimal nCRT candidates through multivariable probability estimation.