Scholarlink

Background <p>The scope of practice of the contemporary midwife encompasses a range of sexual and reproductive healthcare, including care throughout pregnancy. Midwives are experts in pregnancy care, but many do not provide care for women with unexpected (acute) complications in early pregnancy (&lt; 20 weeks) in Australia. Women experiencing acute pregnancy complications &lt; 20 weeks usually attend an emergency department rather than a maternity unit. These settings do not typically employ midwives and may not meet women’s need for timely and informed physical care and psychosocial support. A gap in evidence exists in relation to the role and scope of practice of the midwife in acute early pregnancy care provision in Australia.</p> Methods <p>Midwives and midwifery students in Australia were purposively sampled and invited to complete an online cross-sectional survey exploring midwifery practice in acute early pregnancy care. Data were collected from July 1st to September 30th, 2024. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Free-text responses were analysed using inductive content analysis.</p> Results <p>Responses from 294 midwives and 46 midwifery students (<i>n</i> = 340) were analysed. Participants recognised that midwives should provide acute care in early pregnancy, and many had knowledge, confidence or experience in this area. The most reported setting for acute early pregnancy care provision was the general emergency department; early pregnancy assessment service models were also common. Some settings prioritised the employment of registered nurses over midwives in acute early pregnancy services. Challenges to midwives providing acute early pregnancy care included inadequate clinical exposure as qualified midwives, and women being placed in non-maternity settings.</p> Conclusion <p>Participants supported midwives providing acute care in early pregnancy, confirming that midwives’ professional scope should not be impacted by pregnancy gestation or outcome. However, current midwifery education programs may not be adequately preparing midwives to provide comprehensive care for women with acute early pregnancy complications. Those midwives who are providing care may not be fulfilling professional scope. Findings have utility in supporting policy, education and service review, and highlight further gaps in evidence for future research.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exploring midwifery role and scope in acute early pregnancy care: a survey of midwives and midwifery students in Australia

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月16日

查看全文
  • Nicole Freeman,
  • Tracey Moroney,
  • Jane Warland,
  • Kate Cheney,
  • Michelle Hobday,
  • Zoe Bradfield

摘要

Background

The scope of practice of the contemporary midwife encompasses a range of sexual and reproductive healthcare, including care throughout pregnancy. Midwives are experts in pregnancy care, but many do not provide care for women with unexpected (acute) complications in early pregnancy (< 20 weeks) in Australia. Women experiencing acute pregnancy complications < 20 weeks usually attend an emergency department rather than a maternity unit. These settings do not typically employ midwives and may not meet women’s need for timely and informed physical care and psychosocial support. A gap in evidence exists in relation to the role and scope of practice of the midwife in acute early pregnancy care provision in Australia.

Methods

Midwives and midwifery students in Australia were purposively sampled and invited to complete an online cross-sectional survey exploring midwifery practice in acute early pregnancy care. Data were collected from July 1st to September 30th, 2024. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Free-text responses were analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results

Responses from 294 midwives and 46 midwifery students (n = 340) were analysed. Participants recognised that midwives should provide acute care in early pregnancy, and many had knowledge, confidence or experience in this area. The most reported setting for acute early pregnancy care provision was the general emergency department; early pregnancy assessment service models were also common. Some settings prioritised the employment of registered nurses over midwives in acute early pregnancy services. Challenges to midwives providing acute early pregnancy care included inadequate clinical exposure as qualified midwives, and women being placed in non-maternity settings.

Conclusion

Participants supported midwives providing acute care in early pregnancy, confirming that midwives’ professional scope should not be impacted by pregnancy gestation or outcome. However, current midwifery education programs may not be adequately preparing midwives to provide comprehensive care for women with acute early pregnancy complications. Those midwives who are providing care may not be fulfilling professional scope. Findings have utility in supporting policy, education and service review, and highlight further gaps in evidence for future research.