Scholarlink

Background <p>Calcitonin gene–related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are effective migraine-specific preventive therapies; however, access remains limited in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In such settings, oral migraine preventive medications (OMPMs) continue to serve as the foundation of preventive care. The association between baseline preventive regimens and real-world escalation to CGRP mAbs has not been well characterized.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults with migraine attending a university-based headache clinic in Thailand between January 2021 and December 2023. Participants with at least one baseline OMPM, no prior CGRP mAb exposure, and at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, and migraine subtype, were used to examine associations between baseline OMPM classes and CGRP mAb initiation. A secondary analysis evaluated factors associated with discontinuation of baseline OMPMs.</p> Results <p>Among 80 participants, 16 (20.0%) initiated CGRP mAbs over 11,554 person-days of follow-up, with a median time to initiation of 44.5 days. Baseline use of beta-blockers (BBs) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) was independently associated with a lower likelihood of CGRP mAb initiation (BB: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.66; TCA: aHR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.57). In secondary analyses, baseline BB use was also associated with greater persistence with preventive therapy (aHR for discontinuation 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.64).</p> Conclusions <p>Baseline oral preventive regimens were associated with differing likelihoods of switching to CGRP mAbs in this LMIC setting. Optimizing oral preventive treatment strategies remains essential in settings where access to CGRP-targeted therapies is limited, either due to unavailability or lack of reimbursement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Associations between oral migraine preventive regimens and CGRP monoclonal antibody initiation: real-world evidence from a resource-limited setting

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月1日

查看全文
  • Sekh Thanprasertsuk,
  • Akarin Hiransuthikul,
  • Sirawit Roongrojwittayakul,
  • Thanakit Pongpitakmetha,
  • Wanakorn Rattanawong,
  • Prakit Anukoolwittaya

摘要

Background

Calcitonin gene–related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are effective migraine-specific preventive therapies; however, access remains limited in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In such settings, oral migraine preventive medications (OMPMs) continue to serve as the foundation of preventive care. The association between baseline preventive regimens and real-world escalation to CGRP mAbs has not been well characterized.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults with migraine attending a university-based headache clinic in Thailand between January 2021 and December 2023. Participants with at least one baseline OMPM, no prior CGRP mAb exposure, and at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, and migraine subtype, were used to examine associations between baseline OMPM classes and CGRP mAb initiation. A secondary analysis evaluated factors associated with discontinuation of baseline OMPMs.

Results

Among 80 participants, 16 (20.0%) initiated CGRP mAbs over 11,554 person-days of follow-up, with a median time to initiation of 44.5 days. Baseline use of beta-blockers (BBs) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) was independently associated with a lower likelihood of CGRP mAb initiation (BB: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.66; TCA: aHR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.57). In secondary analyses, baseline BB use was also associated with greater persistence with preventive therapy (aHR for discontinuation 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.64).

Conclusions

Baseline oral preventive regimens were associated with differing likelihoods of switching to CGRP mAbs in this LMIC setting. Optimizing oral preventive treatment strategies remains essential in settings where access to CGRP-targeted therapies is limited, either due to unavailability or lack of reimbursement.