Scholarlink

Background <p>This study employed a hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) to evaluate the economic value of the central dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS) compared to the single-patient dialysis fluid delivery system (SPDDS) in hemodialysis. The findings offer evidence to support hospital procurement and clinical implementation decisions regarding CDDS.</p> Methods <p>A comparative cost analysis was conducted using micro-costing data collected from three hospitals. Costs were estimated for both CDDS and SPDDS, and economic efficiency was evaluated across multiple hemodialysis machine configuration scales. The analysis included total costs, cost structures, and cost savings, along with their constituent components, to identify scenarios in which CDDS provides economic advantages.</p> Results <p>In a dialysis center with 6 hemodialysis machines operating two shifts per day and serving 12 patients daily, CDDS reduced costs by 0.05% compared to SPDDS. As the number of machines increased from 6 to 50, the cost reduction rate rose from 0.05% to 21.08%, demonstrating enhanced economic benefits at larger scales. In a 50-machine center, CDDS saved approximately RMB 84 per treatment session and RMB 2,601,108 annually. The majority of cost savings came from reductions in consumables (74%) and labor (24%). One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed that CDDS consistently yielded cost savings, supporting the robustness of the costing model.</p> Conclusion <p>CDDS demonstrates significant economic value over SPDDS by reducing consumable and labor costs, proving to be a cost-effective solution in dialysis centers with 6 or more machines serving at least 12 patients daily. Clinical engineers play a key role in its implementation. CDDS is suitable for promotion in medium- to large-scale dialysis centers in China.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Hospital-based health technology assessment of central dialysis fluid delivery system for hemodialysis patients

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月27日

查看全文
  • Wendi Cheng,
  • Haiyin Wang,
  • Jiangzi Yuan,
  • Ying Li,
  • Yashuang Luo,
  • Yuyan Fu,
  • Leyi Gu,
  • Jun Xue,
  • Chunlin Jin,
  • Yin Zheng

摘要

Background

This study employed a hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) to evaluate the economic value of the central dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS) compared to the single-patient dialysis fluid delivery system (SPDDS) in hemodialysis. The findings offer evidence to support hospital procurement and clinical implementation decisions regarding CDDS.

Methods

A comparative cost analysis was conducted using micro-costing data collected from three hospitals. Costs were estimated for both CDDS and SPDDS, and economic efficiency was evaluated across multiple hemodialysis machine configuration scales. The analysis included total costs, cost structures, and cost savings, along with their constituent components, to identify scenarios in which CDDS provides economic advantages.

Results

In a dialysis center with 6 hemodialysis machines operating two shifts per day and serving 12 patients daily, CDDS reduced costs by 0.05% compared to SPDDS. As the number of machines increased from 6 to 50, the cost reduction rate rose from 0.05% to 21.08%, demonstrating enhanced economic benefits at larger scales. In a 50-machine center, CDDS saved approximately RMB 84 per treatment session and RMB 2,601,108 annually. The majority of cost savings came from reductions in consumables (74%) and labor (24%). One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed that CDDS consistently yielded cost savings, supporting the robustness of the costing model.

Conclusion

CDDS demonstrates significant economic value over SPDDS by reducing consumable and labor costs, proving to be a cost-effective solution in dialysis centers with 6 or more machines serving at least 12 patients daily. Clinical engineers play a key role in its implementation. CDDS is suitable for promotion in medium- to large-scale dialysis centers in China.