Background <p>Welfare technology is often depicted as a potential solution for managing the increasing challenges on elder care services, which is expected to rise due to demographic changes. In this study, we explore local decision-makers’ perceptions on implementing welfare technologies in Swedish municipal elder care.</p> Methods <p>Four politicians and twelve local government officials were interviewed, and reflexive thematic analysis was utilized.</p> Results <p>Our findings suggest that welfare technology is portrayed as a sustainable long-term solution, governed by bureaucratic structures. Successful implementation requires shared responsibility among various stakeholders but also moving in-between resistance and acceptance among staff and older people. Furthermore, welfare technology was viewed to reduce staff burdens and increase independence and participation for older people.</p> Conclusions <p>Welfare technology is viewed positively by local decision-makers as a long-term solution to challenges associated with funding and staff shortages in elder care. It is expected to reduce the burden on staff and increase independence and participation for older people. However, bureaucratic challenges must be addressed to enhance the quality of elder care.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Decision makers’ perceptions on implementing welfare technology in Swedish municipal elder care: a qualitative study

  • Johannes Österholm,
  • Vedrana Baric,
  • Ingrid Hellström,
  • Katarina Baudin,
  • Åsa Larsson Ranada

摘要

Background

Welfare technology is often depicted as a potential solution for managing the increasing challenges on elder care services, which is expected to rise due to demographic changes. In this study, we explore local decision-makers’ perceptions on implementing welfare technologies in Swedish municipal elder care.

Methods

Four politicians and twelve local government officials were interviewed, and reflexive thematic analysis was utilized.

Results

Our findings suggest that welfare technology is portrayed as a sustainable long-term solution, governed by bureaucratic structures. Successful implementation requires shared responsibility among various stakeholders but also moving in-between resistance and acceptance among staff and older people. Furthermore, welfare technology was viewed to reduce staff burdens and increase independence and participation for older people.

Conclusions

Welfare technology is viewed positively by local decision-makers as a long-term solution to challenges associated with funding and staff shortages in elder care. It is expected to reduce the burden on staff and increase independence and participation for older people. However, bureaucratic challenges must be addressed to enhance the quality of elder care.