Scholarlink

Background <p>The mortality and disability rates among severely injured trauma patients are very high. This study aimed to investigate whether a new in-hospital trauma care model can improve emergency care efficiency and enhance the prognosis of severely injured trauma patients.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective observational study included 366 severely injured trauma patients (ISS ≥ 16) who were admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital between 2023 and 2024. Based on the emergency care model used, patients were divided into the traditional model group (<i>n</i> = 213) from January to April 2023 and the new model group (<i>n</i> = 153) from January to April 2024. The general clinical data, prognosis information, as well as seven emergency quality control indicators for both groups were collected and analyzed.</p> Results <p>The study included 270 male patients (73.8%) and 96 female patients (26.2%), with a mean age of 56 (44, 69) years. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding gender, age, time since injury, mechanism of injury, and vital signs upon admission (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). The new model group had significantly shorter times for establishing effective circulation access (15.66 ± 3.36 vs. 9.44 ± 3.18&#xa0;min), establishing an artificial airway (36.90 ± 12.23 vs. 23.91 ± 9.07&#xa0;min), preparing blood transfusion (48.84 ± 5.73 vs. 31.0 ± 64.67&#xa0;min), completing whole-body CT scans (57.18 ± 8.26 vs. 42.17 ± 7.28&#xa0;min), and developing a definitive treatment plan (77.45 ± 6.26 vs. 56.50 ± 6.35&#xa0;min) compared to the traditional model group. Additionally, the new model group had a significantly higher rate of bedside FAST completion (92.8% vs. 53.1%) and a higher success rate of resuscitation within the first hour (70.9% vs. 85.0%) than the traditional model group. Regarding prognosis, the new model group had a lower overall in-hospital mortality rate (12.1% vs. 5.9%) and a lower incidence of complications such as DIC and ARDS (23.9% vs. 9.2%, all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05).</p> Conclusion <p>The new in-hospital trauma care model significantly enhanced the in-hospital emergency care efficiency, reduced in-hospital mortality, and decreased the incidence of complications for severely injured patients, which may serve as a useful reference for developing countries in similar settings.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The effect of a new in-hospital trauma care model on the outcomes of severely injured trauma patients in the emergency department: a retrospective observational study in China

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月24日

查看全文
  • Qiu Zhao,
  • Yue Zhao,
  • Tingting Ke,
  • Caili Lin,
  • Yao Xu,
  • Yuanyuan Xu,
  • Shuli Liu,
  • Xinqun Li

摘要

Background

The mortality and disability rates among severely injured trauma patients are very high. This study aimed to investigate whether a new in-hospital trauma care model can improve emergency care efficiency and enhance the prognosis of severely injured trauma patients.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 366 severely injured trauma patients (ISS ≥ 16) who were admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital between 2023 and 2024. Based on the emergency care model used, patients were divided into the traditional model group (n = 213) from January to April 2023 and the new model group (n = 153) from January to April 2024. The general clinical data, prognosis information, as well as seven emergency quality control indicators for both groups were collected and analyzed.

Results

The study included 270 male patients (73.8%) and 96 female patients (26.2%), with a mean age of 56 (44, 69) years. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding gender, age, time since injury, mechanism of injury, and vital signs upon admission (P > 0.05). The new model group had significantly shorter times for establishing effective circulation access (15.66 ± 3.36 vs. 9.44 ± 3.18 min), establishing an artificial airway (36.90 ± 12.23 vs. 23.91 ± 9.07 min), preparing blood transfusion (48.84 ± 5.73 vs. 31.0 ± 64.67 min), completing whole-body CT scans (57.18 ± 8.26 vs. 42.17 ± 7.28 min), and developing a definitive treatment plan (77.45 ± 6.26 vs. 56.50 ± 6.35 min) compared to the traditional model group. Additionally, the new model group had a significantly higher rate of bedside FAST completion (92.8% vs. 53.1%) and a higher success rate of resuscitation within the first hour (70.9% vs. 85.0%) than the traditional model group. Regarding prognosis, the new model group had a lower overall in-hospital mortality rate (12.1% vs. 5.9%) and a lower incidence of complications such as DIC and ARDS (23.9% vs. 9.2%, all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The new in-hospital trauma care model significantly enhanced the in-hospital emergency care efficiency, reduced in-hospital mortality, and decreased the incidence of complications for severely injured patients, which may serve as a useful reference for developing countries in similar settings.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.