Scholarlink

Background <p>We evaluated TAPSE/PAi, defined as the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to the indexed main pulmonary artery diameter, as a pragmatic functional-structural index and compared it with TAPSE/sPAP.</p> Methods <p>In this retrospective study, 53 patients with PAH were analyzed. Associations of TAPSE/PAi and TAPSE/sPAP with clinical, biomarker, and invasive hemodynamic variables were assessed. Discrimination for WHO-FC ≥ 3, 6MWD &lt; 165&#xa0;m, and PVR &gt; 5 WU was evaluated by direction-aligned ROC analysis with Youden-optimal thresholds. Age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models reported odds ratios (ORs) per 1-SD increase.</p> Results <p>TAPSE/PAi correlated more strongly than TAPSE/sPAP with WHO-FC (ρ=-0.592 vs. -0.384) and 6MWD (ρ = 0.493 vs. 0.378), whereas TAPSE/sPAP correlated more strongly with NT-proBNP/proBNP (ρ=-0.619 vs. -0.484) and with mPAP/PVR. TAPSE/PAi showed better discrimination for WHO-FC ≥ 3 and 6MWD &lt; 165&#xa0;m while TAPSE/sPAP performed modestly better for PVR &gt; 5 WU The Youden-optimal TAPSE/PAi threshold was ≤ 1.296 for both WHO-FC ≥ 3 and 6MWD &lt; 165&#xa0;m. The higher TAPSE/PAi remained associated with lower odds of WHO-FC ≥ 3 and 6MWD &lt; 165&#xa0;m after age- and sex-adjustment.</p> Conclusions <p>TAPSE/PAi better reflects functional severity and exercise limitation, whereas TAPSE/sPAP is more closely related to biomarker/hemodynamic burden. The indices appear complementary, and TAPSE/PAi may be a practical TR-independent severity marker in PAH. </p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

TAPSE/PAi, a practical echocardiographic functional–structural index, better reflects functional severity than TAPSE/sPAP in pulmonary hypertension

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月8日

查看全文
  • Yunus Emre Yavuz,
  • Yakup Alsancak,
  • Sefa Tatar,
  • Cem Korucu,
  • Hasan Kan,
  • Hakan Akilli,
  • Abdullah İçli̇

摘要

Background

We evaluated TAPSE/PAi, defined as the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to the indexed main pulmonary artery diameter, as a pragmatic functional-structural index and compared it with TAPSE/sPAP.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 53 patients with PAH were analyzed. Associations of TAPSE/PAi and TAPSE/sPAP with clinical, biomarker, and invasive hemodynamic variables were assessed. Discrimination for WHO-FC ≥ 3, 6MWD < 165 m, and PVR > 5 WU was evaluated by direction-aligned ROC analysis with Youden-optimal thresholds. Age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models reported odds ratios (ORs) per 1-SD increase.

Results

TAPSE/PAi correlated more strongly than TAPSE/sPAP with WHO-FC (ρ=-0.592 vs. -0.384) and 6MWD (ρ = 0.493 vs. 0.378), whereas TAPSE/sPAP correlated more strongly with NT-proBNP/proBNP (ρ=-0.619 vs. -0.484) and with mPAP/PVR. TAPSE/PAi showed better discrimination for WHO-FC ≥ 3 and 6MWD < 165 m while TAPSE/sPAP performed modestly better for PVR > 5 WU The Youden-optimal TAPSE/PAi threshold was ≤ 1.296 for both WHO-FC ≥ 3 and 6MWD < 165 m. The higher TAPSE/PAi remained associated with lower odds of WHO-FC ≥ 3 and 6MWD < 165 m after age- and sex-adjustment.

Conclusions

TAPSE/PAi better reflects functional severity and exercise limitation, whereas TAPSE/sPAP is more closely related to biomarker/hemodynamic burden. The indices appear complementary, and TAPSE/PAi may be a practical TR-independent severity marker in PAH.

Graphical abstract