Scholarlink

Background <p>The evaluation of genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) through multi-environment trials (METs) is an essential prerequisite in breeding improvement programs targeting wide adaptation. In this study, a panel of newly developed barley genotypes was examined under field conditions at five experimental sites across Iran’s warm climatic zone during the 2023–2025 growing seasons.</p> Results <p>The pooled analysis of variance clearly demonstrated that effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and GEI influenced all measured traits, including the number of days to heading (DH), days to physiological maturity (DM), grain filling period (GFP), plant height (PH), 1000-kernel weight (TKW), and grain yield (GY). Analytical outputs obtained from the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, as well as the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) approach, highlighted the substantial contribution of genotype × environment interaction to variation in grain yield. Insights from genotype–trait (GT) biplot analysis indicated that TKW and GFP were positively associated with GY. When genotypes were ranked using the multi-trait stability index (MTSI), G5 (1.689), G4 (1.914), G20 (2.380), and G14 (2.508) achieved the highest scores, reflecting superior performance and stability across test environments. A comprehensive evaluation strategy integrating classical AMMI, BLUP, Bayesian AMMI, and genotype-by-environment (GGE) biplot methodologies was employed to identify genotypes that combine productivity with stability. Across all derived stability parameters, including the weighted average of absolute scores (WAAS) and its yield-weighted counterpart (WAASY), genotype G4, derived from the pedigree [Sahra/3/Bda/Rhn-03//ICB-107766], consistently outperformed other candidates. This genotype exhibited a robust yield response, high stability, and broad environmental responsiveness. Independent validation using the stability Mahalanobis distance (SM) index and Y × WAASY biplot visualization further substantiated these findings.</p> Conclusion <p>In conclusion, genotype G4 represents a strong candidate for subsequent validation trials and potential varietal release in the warm agroecological regions of Iran and other areas with comparable climatic conditions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Integrating AMMI, Bayesian-AMMI, BLUP, and GGE biplot models to improve the identification of high-yielding and stable barley genotypes

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月30日

查看全文
  • Alireza Pour-Aboughadareh,
  • Hassan Zali,
  • Ahmad Gholipour,
  • Akbar Marzooghian,
  • Shirali Koohkan,
  • Ali Omrani,
  • Kamal Shahbazi-Homonloo,
  • Abolghasem Moradgholi,
  • Masumeh Kheirgoo,
  • Bita Jamshidi,
  • Mohammad Dabiri,
  • Jan Bocianowski

摘要

Background

The evaluation of genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) through multi-environment trials (METs) is an essential prerequisite in breeding improvement programs targeting wide adaptation. In this study, a panel of newly developed barley genotypes was examined under field conditions at five experimental sites across Iran’s warm climatic zone during the 2023–2025 growing seasons.

Results

The pooled analysis of variance clearly demonstrated that effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and GEI influenced all measured traits, including the number of days to heading (DH), days to physiological maturity (DM), grain filling period (GFP), plant height (PH), 1000-kernel weight (TKW), and grain yield (GY). Analytical outputs obtained from the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, as well as the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) approach, highlighted the substantial contribution of genotype × environment interaction to variation in grain yield. Insights from genotype–trait (GT) biplot analysis indicated that TKW and GFP were positively associated with GY. When genotypes were ranked using the multi-trait stability index (MTSI), G5 (1.689), G4 (1.914), G20 (2.380), and G14 (2.508) achieved the highest scores, reflecting superior performance and stability across test environments. A comprehensive evaluation strategy integrating classical AMMI, BLUP, Bayesian AMMI, and genotype-by-environment (GGE) biplot methodologies was employed to identify genotypes that combine productivity with stability. Across all derived stability parameters, including the weighted average of absolute scores (WAAS) and its yield-weighted counterpart (WAASY), genotype G4, derived from the pedigree [Sahra/3/Bda/Rhn-03//ICB-107766], consistently outperformed other candidates. This genotype exhibited a robust yield response, high stability, and broad environmental responsiveness. Independent validation using the stability Mahalanobis distance (SM) index and Y × WAASY biplot visualization further substantiated these findings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, genotype G4 represents a strong candidate for subsequent validation trials and potential varietal release in the warm agroecological regions of Iran and other areas with comparable climatic conditions.