Scholarlink

Background <p>Turmeric (<i>Curcuma longa</i> L.) is a key spice, medicinal and industrially important crop that is increasingly being cultivated under sustainable practices such as natural farming system (NFS). This study compares NFS and conventional/chemical farming system (CFS) in terms of soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial diversity, and yield parameters, providing a comprehensive understanding of their ecological and agronomic impacts.</p> Results <p>Field experiments evaluated nine NFS treatments alongside CFS for high throughput amplicon (16S rRNA and ITS) metagenomics, soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and yield parameters. NFS treatments with ≥ 5 t/ha mulching and 4 t/ha <i>Ghanjeevamrit</i> (i.e. NFS-T6 and NFS-T9) significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (~ 0.25%), nitrogen (~ 239.9&#xa0;kg/ha), and phosphorus (~ 38.16&#xa0;kg/ha), alongside elevated enzyme activities like alkaline phosphatase (ALP; ~112.11&#xa0;µg PNP/g/hr) and protease (PR; ~16.22&#xa0;µg Tyrosine/g/hr). These treatments also exhibited significantly higher microbial richness and evenness (Shannon index: ~5.09; Simpson index: ~0.981). NFS enriched beneficial bacterial (e.g., <i>Priestia</i>, unclassified Acidobacteria, etc.) and saprophytic fungal genera (e.g., <i>Humicola</i>, <i>Mortierella</i>, etc.), enhancing soil nutrient cycling and soil health. Conversely, CFS enriched chemical-resilient and pathogenic taxa (e.g., <i>Alternaria</i>, <i>Curvularia</i>, etc.). NFS-T5 (40.66 t/ha) and NFS-T9 (40.47 t/ha) yielded over twice the fresh rhizome compared to CFS. NFS treatments recorded higher net returns and Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) of 7.51 to 10.57. Microbial profiling of natural farming (NF) inputs (<i>Beejamrit</i>, <i>Jeevamrit</i>, and <i>Ghanjeevamrit</i>) showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities influencing soil microbiome structure. Co-occurrence network analysis of NF soils revealed that microbial taxa introduced via NF inputs had limited integration into native soil communities, indicating selective incorporation governed by competitive ecological interactions.</p> Conclusions <p>Natural farming practices significantly enhanced soil fertility, microbial community structure, enzymatic activity (ALP and PR), and turmeric productivity with superior BCRs. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting natural farming as a viable and sustainable agricultural approach, contributing to improved soil health and crop performance in turmeric cultivation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Metagenomic insights reveal the impact of natural farming on soil nutrients, enzyme activities, microbial communities, and yield in turmeric cultivation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月1日

查看全文
  • Kartik Gajjar,
  • Sweta Patel,
  • Mahendra Chaudhary,
  • Dhanvanti Agrawal,
  • Rajiv Maniyar,
  • Doongar Chaudhary,
  • C. K. Patel,
  • Chaitanya Joshi,
  • Madhvi Joshi,
  • Darshan Dharajiya

摘要

Background

Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) is a key spice, medicinal and industrially important crop that is increasingly being cultivated under sustainable practices such as natural farming system (NFS). This study compares NFS and conventional/chemical farming system (CFS) in terms of soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial diversity, and yield parameters, providing a comprehensive understanding of their ecological and agronomic impacts.

Results

Field experiments evaluated nine NFS treatments alongside CFS for high throughput amplicon (16S rRNA and ITS) metagenomics, soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and yield parameters. NFS treatments with ≥ 5 t/ha mulching and 4 t/ha Ghanjeevamrit (i.e. NFS-T6 and NFS-T9) significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (~ 0.25%), nitrogen (~ 239.9 kg/ha), and phosphorus (~ 38.16 kg/ha), alongside elevated enzyme activities like alkaline phosphatase (ALP; ~112.11 µg PNP/g/hr) and protease (PR; ~16.22 µg Tyrosine/g/hr). These treatments also exhibited significantly higher microbial richness and evenness (Shannon index: ~5.09; Simpson index: ~0.981). NFS enriched beneficial bacterial (e.g., Priestia, unclassified Acidobacteria, etc.) and saprophytic fungal genera (e.g., Humicola, Mortierella, etc.), enhancing soil nutrient cycling and soil health. Conversely, CFS enriched chemical-resilient and pathogenic taxa (e.g., Alternaria, Curvularia, etc.). NFS-T5 (40.66 t/ha) and NFS-T9 (40.47 t/ha) yielded over twice the fresh rhizome compared to CFS. NFS treatments recorded higher net returns and Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) of 7.51 to 10.57. Microbial profiling of natural farming (NF) inputs (Beejamrit, Jeevamrit, and Ghanjeevamrit) showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities influencing soil microbiome structure. Co-occurrence network analysis of NF soils revealed that microbial taxa introduced via NF inputs had limited integration into native soil communities, indicating selective incorporation governed by competitive ecological interactions.

Conclusions

Natural farming practices significantly enhanced soil fertility, microbial community structure, enzymatic activity (ALP and PR), and turmeric productivity with superior BCRs. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting natural farming as a viable and sustainable agricultural approach, contributing to improved soil health and crop performance in turmeric cultivation.