Scholarlink

Background <p>The <i>Serratia marcescens</i> complex comprises several closely related species with potentially distinct epidemiological characteristics. Recent descriptions of new species further complicate accurate identification using routine clinical microbiology methods. We aimed to compare the current species-level identification by MALDI-TOF MS with Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)-based approaches and to assess concordance among different diagnostic genomic tools.</p> Methods <p>Overall, 107 <i>Serratia</i> bloodstream isolates were analysed. Initial identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS. WGS data were analysed using: Kraken, PATO (MASH distance-based), ribosomal MLST (rMLST), and GTDB-Tk (<i>ani-rep</i> and <i>classify_wf</i> functions).</p> Results <p>MALDI-TOF MS identified <i>S. marcescens</i> as the predominant species (71%). Kraken assigned all isolates to <i>S. marcescens</i>. Phylogeny-based approaches revealed a markedly different distribution. rMLST and GTDB-Tk consistently identified <i>Serratia sarumanii</i> as the most frequent species (36.4% vs. 34.6%), followed by <i>Serratia ureilytica</i> (26.2% vs. 29%) and <i>Serratia nevei</i> (22.4% vs. 21.5%), while <i>S. marcescens</i> represented a minority (5.6% vs. 3.7%). GTDB-Tk showed near-complete concordance with rMLST (95.3%). Also, 38/107 isolates assigned to <i>S. nevei</i> by PATO were reclassified as <i>S. sarumanii</i> by both rMLST and GTDB-Tk. Complete concordance across all methods was observed in only 3.7% of isolates.</p> Conclusions <p>At the moment, species-level classification of <i>Serratia</i> bloodstream isolates is highly method-dependent. Routine diagnostic tools tend to underestimate diversity of the <i>S. marcescens</i> complex, whereas phylogeny-based genomic approaches reveal a more diverse population structure dominated by <i>S. sarumanii</i>, <i>S. ureilytica</i> and <i>S. nevei</i>. These findings highlight the need for cautious interpretation and standardized genomic frameworks with updated databases.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The current discordance on Serratia spp. taxonomical diagnosis using proteomics or genomic tools

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月14日

查看全文
  • Blanca Pérez-Viso,
  • Marta Hernández-García,
  • Miguel D. Fernández-de-Bobadilla,
  • Fernando Baquero,
  • Sonia Aracil-Gisbert,
  • Teresa M. Coque,
  • Rosa del Campo,
  • Rafael Cantón

摘要

Background

The Serratia marcescens complex comprises several closely related species with potentially distinct epidemiological characteristics. Recent descriptions of new species further complicate accurate identification using routine clinical microbiology methods. We aimed to compare the current species-level identification by MALDI-TOF MS with Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)-based approaches and to assess concordance among different diagnostic genomic tools.

Methods

Overall, 107 Serratia bloodstream isolates were analysed. Initial identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS. WGS data were analysed using: Kraken, PATO (MASH distance-based), ribosomal MLST (rMLST), and GTDB-Tk (ani-rep and classify_wf functions).

Results

MALDI-TOF MS identified S. marcescens as the predominant species (71%). Kraken assigned all isolates to S. marcescens. Phylogeny-based approaches revealed a markedly different distribution. rMLST and GTDB-Tk consistently identified Serratia sarumanii as the most frequent species (36.4% vs. 34.6%), followed by Serratia ureilytica (26.2% vs. 29%) and Serratia nevei (22.4% vs. 21.5%), while S. marcescens represented a minority (5.6% vs. 3.7%). GTDB-Tk showed near-complete concordance with rMLST (95.3%). Also, 38/107 isolates assigned to S. nevei by PATO were reclassified as S. sarumanii by both rMLST and GTDB-Tk. Complete concordance across all methods was observed in only 3.7% of isolates.

Conclusions

At the moment, species-level classification of Serratia bloodstream isolates is highly method-dependent. Routine diagnostic tools tend to underestimate diversity of the S. marcescens complex, whereas phylogeny-based genomic approaches reveal a more diverse population structure dominated by S. sarumanii, S. ureilytica and S. nevei. These findings highlight the need for cautious interpretation and standardized genomic frameworks with updated databases.