Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel are integral to disaster and emergency response systems. Recurrent exposure to high-acuity incidents, irregular shifts, and operational pressures may increase vulnerability to psychological distress, with potential implications for workforce sustainability and system resilience. This study assessed the severity distribution and predictors of stress, anxiety, and depression among EMS personnel in the Makkah region of Saudi Arabia.</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and April 2024 among certified EMS professionals employed for &gt; 1 year across the Saudi Red Crescent Authority, Ministry of Health, and Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs. Participants (n = 352) completed an electronic questionnaire including sociodemographic and lifestyle variables and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). Analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and logistic and multivariate linear regression. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05.</p> Results <p>The proportions classified as extremely severe were 12.2% for stress, 23.0% for anxiety, and 17.6% for depression. In bivariate analyses, history of mental illness was associated with higher stress, anxiety, and depression scores; however, in logistic regression it remained significant only for depression. In multivariate linear models, use of medications for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) was positively associated with stress, anxiety, and depression, whereas longer sleep duration was inversely associated with all outcomes. Years of professional experience significantly predicted stress levels.</p> Conclusion <p>EMS personnel in the Makkah region demonstrated a substantial burden of clinically significant psychological distress, particularly for severe anxiety and depression. Sleep duration and NCD medication use emerged as consistent correlates across outcomes, indicating potential targets for occupational health strategies. Differences in estimates compared with other Saudi studies should be interpreted cautiously due to variation in populations, instruments, cut-offs, and study periods.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Psychological distress among emergency medical services personnel: implications for public health preparedness and system resilience

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月6日

查看全文
  • Yasir Almukhlifi,
  • Juan Gómez-Salgado,
  • Maher Alsulami,
  • Arwa Khalid Alhamdan,
  • Shahad Dhafer Alharthi,
  • Yara Sultan Alharbi,
  • Faisal Aseeri,
  • Waad Alsulami,
  • Mariam Barnawy,
  • Krzysztof Goniewicz

摘要

Introduction

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel are integral to disaster and emergency response systems. Recurrent exposure to high-acuity incidents, irregular shifts, and operational pressures may increase vulnerability to psychological distress, with potential implications for workforce sustainability and system resilience. This study assessed the severity distribution and predictors of stress, anxiety, and depression among EMS personnel in the Makkah region of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and April 2024 among certified EMS professionals employed for > 1 year across the Saudi Red Crescent Authority, Ministry of Health, and Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs. Participants (n = 352) completed an electronic questionnaire including sociodemographic and lifestyle variables and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). Analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and logistic and multivariate linear regression. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The proportions classified as extremely severe were 12.2% for stress, 23.0% for anxiety, and 17.6% for depression. In bivariate analyses, history of mental illness was associated with higher stress, anxiety, and depression scores; however, in logistic regression it remained significant only for depression. In multivariate linear models, use of medications for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) was positively associated with stress, anxiety, and depression, whereas longer sleep duration was inversely associated with all outcomes. Years of professional experience significantly predicted stress levels.

Conclusion

EMS personnel in the Makkah region demonstrated a substantial burden of clinically significant psychological distress, particularly for severe anxiety and depression. Sleep duration and NCD medication use emerged as consistent correlates across outcomes, indicating potential targets for occupational health strategies. Differences in estimates compared with other Saudi studies should be interpreted cautiously due to variation in populations, instruments, cut-offs, and study periods.