Background <p>Atogepant is a small-molecule non-competitive calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist efficacious in preventing episodic migraine. Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a slowly propagating depolarization wave underlying migraine aura. We investigated whether the efficacy of atogepant in migraine is mediated by CSD suppression.</p> Method <p>We used Sprague-Dawley rats (<i>n</i> = 28 males, 28 females) to determine the electrical stimulation intensity threshold for CSD induction and the frequency of CSDs induced by continuous topical 1&#xa0;M KCl application sequentially in the same animal, using intracortical glass microelectrodes under isoflurane anesthesia and full systemic physiological monitoring, including arterial blood pressure and blood gases. In a separate cohort, we disrupted the BBB by inducing three CSDs in the contralateral hemisphere using 1&#xa0;M KCl daily for 2 days before CSD susceptibility testing. Both cohorts received atogepant (30&#xa0;mg/kg, once daily oral gavage) or vehicle for four days. CSD susceptibility was examined 1&#xa0;h after the last atogepant dose.</p> Results <p>Atogepant did not affect the CSD threshold, frequency, propagation speed, amplitude, or duration compared with vehicle, either without or with preceding CSDs. Systemic physiological parameters did not differ between groups.</p> Conclusions <p>These data suggest that atogepant efficacy in migraine is not mediated via CSD suppression, even when BBB permeability is increased.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Small-molecule CGRP antagonist atogepant does not affect cortical spreading depression susceptibility in rats

  • Xuyan Jin,
  • Andreia Morais,
  • Yuichi Sasaki,
  • Qingling Zhai,
  • Pradeep Banerjee,
  • Andrea Harriott,
  • Cenk Ayata

摘要

Background

Atogepant is a small-molecule non-competitive calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist efficacious in preventing episodic migraine. Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a slowly propagating depolarization wave underlying migraine aura. We investigated whether the efficacy of atogepant in migraine is mediated by CSD suppression.

Method

We used Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 28 males, 28 females) to determine the electrical stimulation intensity threshold for CSD induction and the frequency of CSDs induced by continuous topical 1 M KCl application sequentially in the same animal, using intracortical glass microelectrodes under isoflurane anesthesia and full systemic physiological monitoring, including arterial blood pressure and blood gases. In a separate cohort, we disrupted the BBB by inducing three CSDs in the contralateral hemisphere using 1 M KCl daily for 2 days before CSD susceptibility testing. Both cohorts received atogepant (30 mg/kg, once daily oral gavage) or vehicle for four days. CSD susceptibility was examined 1 h after the last atogepant dose.

Results

Atogepant did not affect the CSD threshold, frequency, propagation speed, amplitude, or duration compared with vehicle, either without or with preceding CSDs. Systemic physiological parameters did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

These data suggest that atogepant efficacy in migraine is not mediated via CSD suppression, even when BBB permeability is increased.