Abstract <p>We solve the following three problems. 1. How much can the radial growth of an entire function <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m1--> </InlineEquation> be reduced by multiplying it by some nonzero entire function? We give the answer in terms of the growth of the integral means of <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="41" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ln|f|\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m2--> </InlineEquation> over the circles centered at the origin. 2. We estimate the smallest possible radial growth of non zero entire functions that vanish on a given distribution of points <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Z\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m3--> </InlineEquation>. We solve this problem in terms of the growth of the radial integral counting function of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Z\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m4--> </InlineEquation>. 3. Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(F=f/g\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m5--> </InlineEquation> be a meromorphic function with representations as the ratio of entire functions <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f\neq 0\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m6--> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="41" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(g\neq 0\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m7--> </InlineEquation>. How small can the radial growth of entire functions <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m8--> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(g\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m9--> </InlineEquation> be in such representations in relation to the growth of the Nevanlinna characteristic of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8403_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(F\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560856Khabibullin-m10--> </InlineEquation>? All solutions have a non-asymptotic uniform character, and the obtained inequalities are sharp. All of them are based on some main theorem for subharmonic functions, which relies on the Govorov–Petrenko–Dahlberg–Essén inequality and uses our general results on the existence of subharmonic minorants.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Reduction of the Growth of Entire and Subharmonic Functions

  • B. N. Khabibullin

摘要

Abstract

We solve the following three problems. 1. How much can the radial growth of an entire function \(f\) be reduced by multiplying it by some nonzero entire function? We give the answer in terms of the growth of the integral means of \(\ln|f|\) over the circles centered at the origin. 2. We estimate the smallest possible radial growth of non zero entire functions that vanish on a given distribution of points \(Z\) . We solve this problem in terms of the growth of the radial integral counting function of \(Z\) . 3. Let \(F=f/g\) be a meromorphic function with representations as the ratio of entire functions \(f\neq 0\) and \(g\neq 0\) . How small can the radial growth of entire functions \(f\) and \(g\) be in such representations in relation to the growth of the Nevanlinna characteristic of \(F\) ? All solutions have a non-asymptotic uniform character, and the obtained inequalities are sharp. All of them are based on some main theorem for subharmonic functions, which relies on the Govorov–Petrenko–Dahlberg–Essén inequality and uses our general results on the existence of subharmonic minorants.