Abstract <p>In recent works, the full set of three-loop diagrams (of order <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11958_2025_7312_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha _{s}^{2}\)</EquationSource> <!--ContPhys2570042Asatryan-m1--> </InlineEquation>) associated with the current-current operators <i>O</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>O</i><sub>2</sub> contributing to the decay amplitude for <i>b</i> → <i>s</i>γ were calculated. In this paper, one pair of these diagrams is calculated at various values of the charm-quark mass <i>m</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> using different methods, and the numerical accuracy/ease of use of these methods are compared to the analytic results obtained by others. Using the programs AMFlow and DiffExp to solve the differential equations for the master integrals, precise numerical results were obtained across a range of charm-quark mass values. In addition, asymptotic and Taylor series expansions were performed around <i>z</i> = <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11958_2025_7312_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="23" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{m_{c}^{2}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{m_{c}^{2}} {m_{b}^{2}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {m_{b}^{2}}}\)</EquationSource> <!--ContPhys2570042Asatryan-m2--> </InlineEquation> = 0 and <i>z</i> = 1/10, respectively. A fully numerical evaluation of the master integrals using PySecDec was also carried out.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of Various Feynman Diagram Calculation Methods for the Decay bsγ

  • H. H. Asatryan

摘要

Abstract

In recent works, the full set of three-loop diagrams (of order \(\alpha _{s}^{2}\) ) associated with the current-current operators O1 and O2 contributing to the decay amplitude for bsγ were calculated. In this paper, one pair of these diagrams is calculated at various values of the charm-quark mass mc using different methods, and the numerical accuracy/ease of use of these methods are compared to the analytic results obtained by others. Using the programs AMFlow and DiffExp to solve the differential equations for the master integrals, precise numerical results were obtained across a range of charm-quark mass values. In addition, asymptotic and Taylor series expansions were performed around z = \({{m_{c}^{2}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{m_{c}^{2}} {m_{b}^{2}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {m_{b}^{2}}}\) = 0 and z = 1/10, respectively. A fully numerical evaluation of the master integrals using PySecDec was also carried out.