Abstract <p>This integrated study quantifies the suction intensity (<i>C</i><sub><i>q</i></sub>) effects on shock-induced laminar separation bubbles (LSBs) and crossflow instability on a supersonic finite-span 65° swept wing at a Mach number equal to 2 and a unit Reynolds number 3.29 × 10<sup>7</sup> m<sup>–1</sup>. Results demonstrate that low-strength suction (<i>C</i><sub><i>q</i></sub> &lt; 0.01) triggers the LSBs through recompression-shock-induced adverse pressure gradients. Conversely, high-strength suction (<i>C</i><sub><i>q</i></sub> &gt; 0.01) suppresses the LSBs by establishing sustained favorable pressure gradients. At the threshold <i>C</i><sub><i>q</i></sub> = 0.01, flow control is balanced: uniform N-factor distribution is maintained while crossflow instability growth is suppressed; beyond this threshold (<i>C</i><sub><i>q</i></sub>&#xa0;&gt;&#xa0;0.01), however, suction amplifies crossflow instability. These results resolve the trade-off between separation suppression and instability mitigation, establishing <i>C</i><sub><i>q</i></sub> = 0.01 as the optimal design parameter for crossflow instability delay in supersonic swept wings.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Wall Suction on Laminar Separation Bubbles and Crossflow Instability of a Supersonic Finite-Span Swept Wing

  • L. Wang,
  • M. C. Duan,
  • G. H. Tu,
  • Z. H. Han,
  • X. Chen,
  • C. Q. Li

摘要

Abstract

This integrated study quantifies the suction intensity (Cq) effects on shock-induced laminar separation bubbles (LSBs) and crossflow instability on a supersonic finite-span 65° swept wing at a Mach number equal to 2 and a unit Reynolds number 3.29 × 107 m–1. Results demonstrate that low-strength suction (Cq < 0.01) triggers the LSBs through recompression-shock-induced adverse pressure gradients. Conversely, high-strength suction (Cq > 0.01) suppresses the LSBs by establishing sustained favorable pressure gradients. At the threshold Cq = 0.01, flow control is balanced: uniform N-factor distribution is maintained while crossflow instability growth is suppressed; beyond this threshold (Cq > 0.01), however, suction amplifies crossflow instability. These results resolve the trade-off between separation suppression and instability mitigation, establishing Cq = 0.01 as the optimal design parameter for crossflow instability delay in supersonic swept wings.