Abstract <p>The results of counting meiofauna in samples taken by different gear types (grabs, box and tube corers, and SCUBA hand corers) are compared. The published data (on 1412 stations) and our own survey data (ten stations at depths of 38–260 m in the White Sea) are analyzed. Meiofauna abundance exponentially decreases with depth. No significant gear-related differences in total abundance and taxa composition are found at shallow depths (to 50–100 m). Deeper, the meiofauna abundance in grab-collected samples is underestimated almost tenfold, whereas tube corers are the most efficient.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparative Analysis of Efficiency of Meiobenthos Sampling Gears at Different Depths

  • A. I. Azovsky,
  • V. O. Mokievsky,
  • A. E. Rosinskaya

摘要

Abstract

The results of counting meiofauna in samples taken by different gear types (grabs, box and tube corers, and SCUBA hand corers) are compared. The published data (on 1412 stations) and our own survey data (ten stations at depths of 38–260 m in the White Sea) are analyzed. Meiofauna abundance exponentially decreases with depth. No significant gear-related differences in total abundance and taxa composition are found at shallow depths (to 50–100 m). Deeper, the meiofauna abundance in grab-collected samples is underestimated almost tenfold, whereas tube corers are the most efficient.