Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To validate a new digital device: Optotab®+ (SmarThings4Vision) for measuring visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS).</p> Methods <p>A validation study was conducted involving 20 healthy subjects (aged: 18–29 years). Distance and near VA and CS were assessed using the Optotab®+ and compared with the ETDRS test and Sloan letters for distance VA, the ETDRS test and LEA numbers® near vision card for near VA and the Regan and CSV-1000 tests for CS.</p> Results <p>No significant differences were noted between the right eye (RE) and left eye (L&#xa0;for distance (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.99) and near VA (<i>p</i> = 0.32) or test–retest measurements (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) using the Optotab®+. Distance VA differed significantly from the ETDRS (mean differences: −0.07 and −0.07 logMAR for the RE and LE, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) indicated moderate reliability (RE: 0.64, LE: 0.48), while the ANOVA showed no significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.75 for RE and <i>p</i> = 0.58 for LE). For CS, no significant differences were found between the RE and LE, except at 12 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.04). ICC was highest at 18 cpd (0.90). A significant test–retest difference was observed at 6 cpd for the RE (0.10 log units, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Comparisons showed significant differences at 6 cpd between Optotab®+ and the CSV-1000, and at 3, 12 and 18 cpd between Optotab®+ and the Regan test. ICC indicated low to high reliability across spatial frequencies, while the ANOVA did not show significant differences or low variability. No significant inter-examiner differences were identified in VA and CS (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), confirming strong reproducibility.</p> Conclusions <p>This study demonstrates that the Optotab®+ has moderate reliability for VA assessment and higher precision at higher spatial frequencies for CS, suggesting its clinical utility. Outcomes regarding reliability, repeatability and reproducibility support its validity as an effective tool for measuring visual parameters in clinical practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Validation and evaluation of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with a new digital device: OPTOTAB®+

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月13日

查看全文
  • Víctor Ponce-García,
  • María-Carmen Silva-Viguera,
  • Marta-C. García-Romera,
  • Yael Guerra-Sancho,
  • Noelia Heredia-Ríos,
  • María-José Bautista-Llamas

摘要

Purpose

To validate a new digital device: Optotab®+ (SmarThings4Vision) for measuring visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS).

Methods

A validation study was conducted involving 20 healthy subjects (aged: 18–29 years). Distance and near VA and CS were assessed using the Optotab®+ and compared with the ETDRS test and Sloan letters for distance VA, the ETDRS test and LEA numbers® near vision card for near VA and the Regan and CSV-1000 tests for CS.

Results

No significant differences were noted between the right eye (RE) and left eye (L for distance (p > 0.99) and near VA (p = 0.32) or test–retest measurements (p > 0.05) using the Optotab®+. Distance VA differed significantly from the ETDRS (mean differences: −0.07 and −0.07 logMAR for the RE and LE, respectively, p = 0.01). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) indicated moderate reliability (RE: 0.64, LE: 0.48), while the ANOVA showed no significant differences (p = 0.75 for RE and p = 0.58 for LE). For CS, no significant differences were found between the RE and LE, except at 12 cpd (p = 0.04). ICC was highest at 18 cpd (0.90). A significant test–retest difference was observed at 6 cpd for the RE (0.10 log units, p = 0.01). Comparisons showed significant differences at 6 cpd between Optotab®+ and the CSV-1000, and at 3, 12 and 18 cpd between Optotab®+ and the Regan test. ICC indicated low to high reliability across spatial frequencies, while the ANOVA did not show significant differences or low variability. No significant inter-examiner differences were identified in VA and CS (p > 0.05), confirming strong reproducibility.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the Optotab®+ has moderate reliability for VA assessment and higher precision at higher spatial frequencies for CS, suggesting its clinical utility. Outcomes regarding reliability, repeatability and reproducibility support its validity as an effective tool for measuring visual parameters in clinical practice.