Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To determine the impact of using child-friendly action video games combined with monocular occlusion for the treatment of children with amblyopia compared with occlusion alone.</p> Methods <p>Twenty-eight children aged 4–10 years (mean age: 5.80 ± 1.54 years) with anisometropic and/or strabismic amblyopia were included. Each participant was previously prescribed an optimal refractive correction, and after 8 weeks was randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups: action video games (AVG) plus occlusion (<i>n</i> = 14) or passive occlusion alone (PO) (<i>n</i> = 14). Visual acuity (VA) and stereoacuity (ST) were measured at baseline and following 14, 28 and 42 h of treatment. Compliance was monitored using parental registry and Google Analytics.</p> Results <p>After 42 h, both groups showed significant improvement in the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.04 for the AVG and PO groups, respectively. However, VA recovery was significantly greater (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and faster with monocular AVG plus occlusion (0.18 logMAR) compared with occlusion alone (0.06 logMAR) in the amblyopic eye. The small improvement (0.02 logMAR) in the non-amblyopic eye was not significant for either group. No significant differences between groups were observed for ST (<i>p</i> = 0.38).</p> Conclusions <p>These findings suggest that combining occlusion and action video games at home results in greater effectiveness and efficiency in improving VA in children with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Efficacy of patching combined with action video games in amblyopic children aged 4–10 years: A randomised clinical trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月6日

查看全文
  • Laura Asensio-Jurado,
  • Marc Argilés,
  • Valldeflors Vinuela-Navarro,
  • Lluïsa Quevedo-Junyent,
  • Dennis M. Levi

摘要

Purpose

To determine the impact of using child-friendly action video games combined with monocular occlusion for the treatment of children with amblyopia compared with occlusion alone.

Methods

Twenty-eight children aged 4–10 years (mean age: 5.80 ± 1.54 years) with anisometropic and/or strabismic amblyopia were included. Each participant was previously prescribed an optimal refractive correction, and after 8 weeks was randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups: action video games (AVG) plus occlusion (n = 14) or passive occlusion alone (PO) (n = 14). Visual acuity (VA) and stereoacuity (ST) were measured at baseline and following 14, 28 and 42 h of treatment. Compliance was monitored using parental registry and Google Analytics.

Results

After 42 h, both groups showed significant improvement in the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, p < 0.001 and p = 0.04 for the AVG and PO groups, respectively. However, VA recovery was significantly greater (p = 0.01) and faster with monocular AVG plus occlusion (0.18 logMAR) compared with occlusion alone (0.06 logMAR) in the amblyopic eye. The small improvement (0.02 logMAR) in the non-amblyopic eye was not significant for either group. No significant differences between groups were observed for ST (p = 0.38).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that combining occlusion and action video games at home results in greater effectiveness and efficiency in improving VA in children with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia.