Scholarlink

<p>In <i>Netherland</i>, Joseph O’Neill stages an ethical and emotional reorientation through the interaction of architecture, gesture, and bodily posture. This paper deepens existing spatial readings by proposing a two-tier typology of postural imaginary: a macro-framework distinguishing vertical, horizontal, and inclined postural imaginaries, and a micro-analytic framework detailing position, orientation, viewpoint, affordances, and whole/part postures. Through a phenomenological approach, the analysis shows that <i>Netherland</i> dramatizes the collapse of vertical postural imaginaries—fractured by skyscraper contradictions and aviation’s bifurcated spatial logic—and stages Hans’s reorientation through a horizontal imaginary cultivated by cricket. The novel culminates in the emergence of an inclined postural imaginary atop the London Eye, which dismantles the verticalized, pedestalizing relations structuring Hans’s familial and marital life. By tracing how these vertical, horizontal, and inclined postural imaginaries interact, collide, and recompose, the paper demonstrates how Hans’s bodily reorientation models an alternative relational stance capable of reimagining America’s post-9/11 vertical postural imaginary. In a time marked by global volatility and antagonistic postural forces, the turn toward an inclined postural imaginary grounded in connection, care, and responsibility appears not only necessary but urgent.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Establishing the inclined postural imaginary in Netherland: a phenomenological approach to spatial and bodily mediated relational possibilities

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月27日

查看全文
  • Yabo Li

摘要

In Netherland, Joseph O’Neill stages an ethical and emotional reorientation through the interaction of architecture, gesture, and bodily posture. This paper deepens existing spatial readings by proposing a two-tier typology of postural imaginary: a macro-framework distinguishing vertical, horizontal, and inclined postural imaginaries, and a micro-analytic framework detailing position, orientation, viewpoint, affordances, and whole/part postures. Through a phenomenological approach, the analysis shows that Netherland dramatizes the collapse of vertical postural imaginaries—fractured by skyscraper contradictions and aviation’s bifurcated spatial logic—and stages Hans’s reorientation through a horizontal imaginary cultivated by cricket. The novel culminates in the emergence of an inclined postural imaginary atop the London Eye, which dismantles the verticalized, pedestalizing relations structuring Hans’s familial and marital life. By tracing how these vertical, horizontal, and inclined postural imaginaries interact, collide, and recompose, the paper demonstrates how Hans’s bodily reorientation models an alternative relational stance capable of reimagining America’s post-9/11 vertical postural imaginary. In a time marked by global volatility and antagonistic postural forces, the turn toward an inclined postural imaginary grounded in connection, care, and responsibility appears not only necessary but urgent.