<p>Policymakers have attempted to address the rising care demands of older adults by introducing marketization into community services. However, a thorny issue arises: for some older adults, service accessibility may not have improved and may even have worsened due to marketization. The theoretical relationship between marketization and service accessibility remains unclear. This article focuses on a market-oriented practice in China, venture philanthropy, which allows us to isolate the effects of marketization. Using a quasi-experimental approach, this study investigated the impact of venture philanthropy on the accessibility of community service for older adults. Our findings revealed that the effects of marketization are complex. While marketization generally increases accessibility, its effects are heterogeneous, with more significant benefits for high-income groups. Even with some support, the most disadvantaged groups may still struggle to benefit from marketization. This article provides direct evidence of marketization’s impact on the long-term care system and urges policymakers to address the inequalities that may arise from such market-driven approaches.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Does the venture philanthropy of community service enhance older adults’ service accessibility?—Evidence from China

  • Hang Li,
  • Huijun Liu

摘要

Policymakers have attempted to address the rising care demands of older adults by introducing marketization into community services. However, a thorny issue arises: for some older adults, service accessibility may not have improved and may even have worsened due to marketization. The theoretical relationship between marketization and service accessibility remains unclear. This article focuses on a market-oriented practice in China, venture philanthropy, which allows us to isolate the effects of marketization. Using a quasi-experimental approach, this study investigated the impact of venture philanthropy on the accessibility of community service for older adults. Our findings revealed that the effects of marketization are complex. While marketization generally increases accessibility, its effects are heterogeneous, with more significant benefits for high-income groups. Even with some support, the most disadvantaged groups may still struggle to benefit from marketization. This article provides direct evidence of marketization’s impact on the long-term care system and urges policymakers to address the inequalities that may arise from such market-driven approaches.