<p>The US-China rivalry is often seen as a threat to global stability. However, we argue that, for now, the US and China are both contributing to global stability and prosperity by providing global public goods that incentivize states to keep barriers to trade and investment low and that encourage firms to conduct business in foreign markets. In doing so, they are acting as dual hegemons. While this concept has been introduced in earlier work, we go farther here by developing dual hegemony as a theory and explaining its operation in practice. In doing so, we examine the power and leadership of each country in the provision of key global public goods. Our analysis suggests that China is focusing on public goods related to trade, while the US is focusing on public goods related to international security.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Competing powers and global leadership in the 21st century: can two rivals foster hegemonic stability?

  • Jonas Gamso,
  • Robert Grosse

摘要

The US-China rivalry is often seen as a threat to global stability. However, we argue that, for now, the US and China are both contributing to global stability and prosperity by providing global public goods that incentivize states to keep barriers to trade and investment low and that encourage firms to conduct business in foreign markets. In doing so, they are acting as dual hegemons. While this concept has been introduced in earlier work, we go farther here by developing dual hegemony as a theory and explaining its operation in practice. In doing so, we examine the power and leadership of each country in the provision of key global public goods. Our analysis suggests that China is focusing on public goods related to trade, while the US is focusing on public goods related to international security.