Scholarlink

<p>Despite frequent references to ‘paradigm’ and ‘paradigm shift’ in urban design, these terms are often conflated with incremental methodological or policy adjustments rather than fundamental epistemic change. This <i>Viewpoint</i> proposes a conceptual typology distinguishing genuine epistemic transformations from tactical, normative, or historical shifts. Drawing on recent literature (2000–2026), it clarifies how paradigmatic language is used, identifies recurring patterns, and highlights the effects of terminological imprecision on interpreting disciplinary change. By emphasizing conceptual rigor and analytical clarity, our viewpoint article provides criteria for evaluating claims of paradigm shifts, supporting a more accurate assessment of professional and epistemic evolution.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

When a paradigm is not a paradigm shift: typology for urban design discourse

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月22日

查看全文
  • Hisham Abusaada,
  • Abeer Elshater

摘要

Despite frequent references to ‘paradigm’ and ‘paradigm shift’ in urban design, these terms are often conflated with incremental methodological or policy adjustments rather than fundamental epistemic change. This Viewpoint proposes a conceptual typology distinguishing genuine epistemic transformations from tactical, normative, or historical shifts. Drawing on recent literature (2000–2026), it clarifies how paradigmatic language is used, identifies recurring patterns, and highlights the effects of terminological imprecision on interpreting disciplinary change. By emphasizing conceptual rigor and analytical clarity, our viewpoint article provides criteria for evaluating claims of paradigm shifts, supporting a more accurate assessment of professional and epistemic evolution.