Scholarlink

<p>The SDGs miss crucial dimensions when viewed from the cosmovisions of Ubuntu, Buen Vivir, Buddhist Happiness and Sami Arbediehtu. What principles can be derived from these cosmovisions to guide discussions after 2030? As methodology we use a dialogical intercultural philosophical reflection and a decolonial stance addressing planetary survival instead of sustainable development,&#xa0;to develop principles for after 2030, for example&#xa0;to be included in a Culture Goal using the transformative power of culture. After analysing and comparing the four cosmovisions, we suggest ‘Harmony with Nature’ as an umbrella planetary wellbeing concept. Other principles could be: (<b>social SDGs:</b>) harmony with oneself, others and nature; interculturality and epistemic diversity; community flourishing; balance of masculine and feminine values; intertwinement of spiritual, emotional, physical, communal health; serving others as educational goal; (<b>green SDGs:)</b>&#xa0;intrinsic value of nature as part of the community; recognizing ancestorial legacy and future generations’ needs; (<b>economic SDGs:)</b>&#xa0;economics of collective well-being, earth governance and society-oriented businesses; <b>(SDG16:)</b>&#xa0;participatory, ‘deep’ consensus oriented democracy; collective dignity, restorative justice; <b>(SDG17 global partnership:)</b>&#xa0;interdependence of all life.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Future of Sustainable Development Goals and Culture: Addressing Missing Dimensions from Four Cosmovisions African Ubuntu, Latin-American Buen Vivir, Buddhist Happiness and Nordic Sami Arbediehtu

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月1日

查看全文
  • Dorine E. van Norren,
  • Maren Seehawer

摘要

The SDGs miss crucial dimensions when viewed from the cosmovisions of Ubuntu, Buen Vivir, Buddhist Happiness and Sami Arbediehtu. What principles can be derived from these cosmovisions to guide discussions after 2030? As methodology we use a dialogical intercultural philosophical reflection and a decolonial stance addressing planetary survival instead of sustainable development, to develop principles for after 2030, for example to be included in a Culture Goal using the transformative power of culture. After analysing and comparing the four cosmovisions, we suggest ‘Harmony with Nature’ as an umbrella planetary wellbeing concept. Other principles could be: (social SDGs:) harmony with oneself, others and nature; interculturality and epistemic diversity; community flourishing; balance of masculine and feminine values; intertwinement of spiritual, emotional, physical, communal health; serving others as educational goal; (green SDGs:) intrinsic value of nature as part of the community; recognizing ancestorial legacy and future generations’ needs; (economic SDGs:) economics of collective well-being, earth governance and society-oriented businesses; (SDG16:) participatory, ‘deep’ consensus oriented democracy; collective dignity, restorative justice; (SDG17 global partnership:) interdependence of all life.