Scholarlink

<p>The integration of peer support workers (PSWs) in mental healthcare challenges not only the prevailing medical model in practice but also its underlying attitudinal structures. This paper develops a theoretical framework based on Ortega y Gasset’s philosophy of belief to conceptualize disease models as attitudes that shape how stakeholders perceive mental health issues, and secondarily, act with regard to them. Understanding the medical model as an embodied system of beliefs allows for an analysis of resistance to PSWs, as beliefs regarding their usefulness may conflict with stakeholders’ previous attitudes and therefore force attitudinal transformation. We argue that PSW integration can foster a shift from a hierarchical, deficit-based system to a co-productive model that values lived experience and recovery and loosens fixed medical categories. However, this process may not only require structured training, institutional support, and collaborative engagement, but also necessitate professionals to self-reflect on their own attitudes and belief systems. Our proposed theoretical framework posits that attitudinal change, rather than policy reform alone, is key to making peer support a meaningful component of mental healthcare.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Disease model as attitude: a doxastic framework and the challenges of peer support work in mental health

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月20日

查看全文
  • Guillermo Ruiz-Pérez

摘要

The integration of peer support workers (PSWs) in mental healthcare challenges not only the prevailing medical model in practice but also its underlying attitudinal structures. This paper develops a theoretical framework based on Ortega y Gasset’s philosophy of belief to conceptualize disease models as attitudes that shape how stakeholders perceive mental health issues, and secondarily, act with regard to them. Understanding the medical model as an embodied system of beliefs allows for an analysis of resistance to PSWs, as beliefs regarding their usefulness may conflict with stakeholders’ previous attitudes and therefore force attitudinal transformation. We argue that PSW integration can foster a shift from a hierarchical, deficit-based system to a co-productive model that values lived experience and recovery and loosens fixed medical categories. However, this process may not only require structured training, institutional support, and collaborative engagement, but also necessitate professionals to self-reflect on their own attitudes and belief systems. Our proposed theoretical framework posits that attitudinal change, rather than policy reform alone, is key to making peer support a meaningful component of mental healthcare.